Big Law is Celebrating Juneteenth This Year. What About Next Year?
An industry shift may be underway, but some question whether it will extend beyond the calendar year—or the calendar itself.
June 16, 2020 at 02:57 PM
5 minute read
Close to two dozen major law firms have announced work holidays June 19—known as Juneteenth—to commemorate the end of U.S. slavery and to encourage employees to reflect on racism. Other firms will likely follow suit this year, eager to signal their commitment to racial justice amid the protests sparked by George Floyd's death.
A handful of those firms have gone further and vowed to make Juneteenth a permanent holiday—suggesting a new industry standard in the making even as deep racial imbalances persist in Big Law.
So far Akerman; Foley Hoag; Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison; and Seyfarth Shaw are among those confirming that June 19 will remain a paid holiday at their firms beyond 2020. Other firms held open the possibility, saying they haven't made that decision yet.
"The day should be marked to provide a time of deep reflection for all Americans, not just persons and communities of color, and not just in 2020, but going forward," said Paul Weiss chairman Brad Karp. "If our nation's history has taught us anything, it is that the fight for racial justice is never-ending, filled with daunting challenges and obstacles, and we must never let down our guard. Commemorating Juneteenth each year is an important step in the quest for racial justice, in my view."
Observing Juneteenth is one step law firms can take to show their commitment, said Scott Meyers, Akerman's chairman and CEO.
"Culture is what you do, not just what you say," Meyers said.
Other firms marking the day as a holiday this year, such as Sidley Austin and Ropes & Gray, said Monday that they hadn't decided yet whether to also close June 19 in future years. But both Michael Schmidtberger and David Djaha, the chair of Sidley's executive committee and managing partner of Ropes & Gray, respectively, said their firms will commemorate Juneteenth in the future. It just may not be a work holiday, they said.
"We're going to want to evaluate the best way we can support the concerns of our people, and it very well may be to make it a permanent holiday," Schmidtberger said. "But I don't know that yet."
The holiday commemorates June 19, 1865, when a Union general declared in Galveston, Texas, that all slaves in the state were free, two and a half years after President Abraham Lincoln signed the Emancipation Proclamation.
Given the enduring racial imbalances at law firms—particularly when it comes to African Americans, and particularly at the partner level—some are cynical about the rush to publicly embrace Juneteenth.
Recognizing the holiday is a positive step but accomplishes nothing on its own, said Donald Prophete, a senior name partner at Constangy Brooks Smith & Prophete who has voiced skepticism about diversity efforts in the industry. He said he doesn't want to people "to simply accept these very small, menial, inconsequential changes and just put lipstick on the pig."
Prophete wants to see corporations hiring outside counsel of color and then spending "real money" on their services. Prophete said lawyers of color get less than 1% of the business that's sent to law firms, which affects their ability to rise through the ranks.
The number of lawyers of color working at Am Law 200 firms remains stubbornly low, increasing by just 3.9% over the last decade, according to The American Lawyer's 2020 Diversity Scorecard. And there is fear that the decisions law firms have taken to stay afloat during the COVID-19 pandemic could reset some of that limited progress.
The Diversity Scorecard showed Cleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton as the Big Law firm with the greatest percentage of African American lawyers, with 8.4% last year, and the proportion at most firms is far smaller. In 2019, the percentage of black or African American law associates working in large law firms finally—and barely—surpassed its 2009 level, according to a 2019 study from the National Association of Legal Placement.
That same study found that "the overall arc of the storyline for large law firm diversity remains the same—it is one of slow incremental gains for women and people of color in both the associate and partnership ranks, interrupted by some recession-era setbacks, but at a rate so slow as to almost seem imperceptible at times."
For some, like Prophete, those kinds of imbalances overshadow moves to designate a holiday. "Us sharing a burger on Juneteenth is not that relevant to me," he said.
|Read More
Major Law Firms Announce Plans to Close for Juneteenth Holiday Marking Emancipation
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllA Look Back at High-Profile Hires in Big Law From Federal Government
4 minute readArnold & Porter Matches Market Year-End Bonus, Requires Billable Threshold for Special Bonuses
3 minute readGrabbing Market Share From Rivals, Law Firms Ramped Up Group Lateral Hires
Law Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Trailblazing Broward Judge Retires; Legacy Includes Bush v. Gore
- 2Federal Judge Named in Lawsuit Over Underage Drinking Party at His California Home
- 3'Almost an Arms Race': California Law Firms Scooped Up Lateral Talent by the Handful in 2024
- 4Pittsburgh Judge Rules Loan Company's Online Arbitration Agreement Unenforceable
- 5As a New Year Dawns, the Value of Florida’s Revised Mediation Laws Comes Into Greater Focus
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250