Law Firms Are Supporting Attorney Activism, But Some Fear It Won't Last
"I wanted to create a safe space where I could integrate my passion for social justice with the job," said Debevoise associate Justin Maffett, who said the firm has been supportive.
June 17, 2020 at 03:59 PM
6 minute read
Debevoise & Plimpton first-year associate Justin Maffett was protesting racial injustice when he was arrested on the Upper East Side of Manhattan earlier this month and charged with a misdemeanor for breaking an 8 p.m. curfew.
When he came to Debevoise in 2019, he said, he was honest with partners about his commitment to economic and racial justice. "From day one, I wanted to create a safe space where I could integrate my passion for social justice with the job," he said.
And Debevoise has been supportive of his efforts thus far, including providing representation on the city's misdemeanor charges on his arrest, he said.
In the wake of George Floyd's death at the hands of Minneapolis police and the national protests that followed, large law firms—like many of their corporate clients—are going to great lengths to become more visible in support of attorneys' own activism efforts. Firms are supporting lawyers or staff who have demonstrated, in addition to issuing statements denouncing racism, ramping up pro bono work and offering large donations to various nonprofits.
Norton Rose Fulbright is giving paid time off to employees to attend protests. Katten Muchin Rosenman announced a "Day of Reflection" — a paid day off from work — to encourage employees to engage in a community cause, such as a peaceful protest. Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr said it will provide legal assistance to "members of our community" who are arrested in any peaceful protest. Some firms are also providing pro bono help to protesters beyond their own employees, as part of their pledges to expand their pro bono work.
But while lawyers agree that the legal industry is handling this moment differently than other times of social unrest, many are concerned about how long Big Law's—and society's—commitment will last.
William K. Whitner, chairman of Paul Hastings' complex litigation and trial practice group, as well as co-chairman of the firm's diversity council, said the legal industry is off to a good start in vocalizing support for racial justice causes but sustained momentum is still in doubt.
"We can't lose this opportunity while people are speaking out," Whitner said. "I fear if that moment starts to ease, people will find it too risky."
|'Silence' Is Part of the Problem
Attorney activism has manifested itself in several ways. There are attorneys such as Maffett, who took a peaceful stance in a nonviolent protest. A couple of other lawyers, including now-suspended Pryor Cashman associate Colinford Mattis, have been charged in connection with a Molotov cocktail attack on a police vehicle.
Whitner said he believed the normal lawyer pitfalls associated with speaking out on social or political issues, potentially offending a client or going against the grain of a conservatively risk-averse firm, have been somewhat tempered by the overwhelming evidence of culpable police officers, including Derek Chauvin, who is charged with second-degree murder in Floyd's death.
The voices speaking out in unison against law enforcement violence and prejudice against black Americans are fueled, in part, by the nature of the police's actions against Floyd and the need to no longer stay silent, he added.
"It highlighted the problem of people doing nothing, what silence and acquiescence can do," Whitner said. "They [the three other officers on the scene] played a part. For so many people, typically the mindset is, 'It's not me, I'm not the problem.' This situation highlights that doing nothing is part of the problem."
People also feel more comfortable speaking out because of the circumstances underlying Floyd's death, Whitner added.
"It wasn't something that happened quickly or was because of a snap reaction [by police]," he said. "It didn't leave any area for disagreement about it being wrong."
One way Whitner feels Big Law can make an impact that resonates past the swell of initial support is by being more strategic in pro bono efforts.
"Firms are committed to pro bono, but it isn't necessarily targeted to an end goal. We have the bodies and the capability to do that," Whitner said. "We have the skill set."
Others, including McDermott Will & Emery chairman Ira Coleman, agree that "this time is different."
"We've always encouraged our people to stand up for social justice and to fight for racial equality through our pro bono and community efforts," Coleman said in an email, but now "people are heartbroken and outraged, rightfully so, and want to seize this moment to create enduring change."
|Balance and Fear
For Maffett, it can be difficult to be both a corporate attorney and a social activist.
"The balancing act for me has come in the last 36 hours or so," Maffett said earlier this month, shortly after his arrest. "I obviously have billable work I need to get to, calls today that I need to plan for."
Maffett believes the coronavirus pandemic and its associated shutdown orders have made this balancing act possible, for him and for others.
"The difference right now is that we are under work-from-home and stay-at-home orders," he said. "With that comes more autonomy over your schedule and the ability to shift your responsibilities around. Working from home, I can multitask in a way that I could not in the office."
But, echoing Whitner, Maffett said he fears that once these orders have been lifted, the momentum of the protests could wane.
"I want to be as optimistic as possible and am heartened by what has been demonstrated in the last few days," he said. But "my concern is that once the city starts to open up, when bars and restaurants are open, people will find other ways to spend their time when they have to start doing the 9-5 again."
|Read More:
Law Firms Voice Support for Change—and Pledge to Donate and Take Action
What the Death of George Floyd Should Teach the Legal Industry
Lawyers Accused of Throwing Molotov Cocktail in Brooklyn Protests Return to Jail as 2nd Circuit Grants Stay
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllMore Big Law Firms Rush to Match Associate Bonuses, While Some Offer Potential for Even More
Holland & Knight, Akin, Crowell, Barnes and Day Pitney Add to DC Practices
3 minute readLaw Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1These 2 Lawyers Just Became Florida Judges
- 2'Disease-Causing Bacteria': Colgate and Tom’s of Maine Face Toothpaste Class Action
- 3Trump's SEC Overhaul: What It Means for Big Law Capital Markets, Crypto Work
- 4Armstrong Teasdale's London Creditors Face Big Losses
- 5Texas Court Invalidates SEC’s Dealer Rule, Siding with Crypto Advocates
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250