King & Spalding Scoops Up 4 More Partners From Boies Schiller
The departures come one week after Boies Schiller lost two high-profile rainmakers to Paul Weiss, and amid what Boies Schiller has said is a planned restructuring of the firm.
June 19, 2020 at 06:45 AM
4 minute read
King & Spalding had recruited four more complex commercial litigators from Boies Schiller Flexner, including one who had served on its executive committee.
The departures of New York-based Damien Marshall, Andrew Michaelson, Leigh Nathanson and Laura Harris from Boies Schiller come on top of the firm's earlier raid of 15 partners from the firm's West Coast offices in April. The exits also come one week after Boies Schiller saw two high-profile rainmakers—Karen Dunn and Bill Isaacson—join Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison.
Marshall, like Dunn, was on Boies Schiller's four-person management committee when it was first announced in November 2018. In an interview, Marshall listed King & Spalding's collaborative culture as well as its support for complex litigation that often has an investigation aspect as some of the reasons why he and his group are leaving.
"The decision-making process wasn't driven by what was happening at [Boies Schiller] or what was happening with others who were making other decisions about opportunities at the firm," Marshall said. "It was really about this incredible platform and opportunity King & Spalding was offering us. When it became clear to us this was a unique and great fit for our entire group, we decided to accept it and explore the opportunity."
While King & Spalding has now recruited 19 partners from Boies Schiller within two months, it also has deferred its distributions for current partners, which were due to be paid around May, by two months, Law.com reported Friday. Sources said King & Spalding had deferred the distributions as a "precautionary measure" and the firm had also developed a cautious and strategic approach to hiring.
A King & Spalding spokeswoman said the New York group's first day is Tuesday.
Marshall said the fact that he knew so many lawyers at King & Spalding was a factor in his decision to join. The other 15 partners who joined King & Spalding left Boies Schiller's San Francisco and Los Angeles offices.
Clients of the departing quartet in New York include a mixture of financial services and technology sector companies. Marshall declined to comment on client matters other than to say that the group has "a significant financial services practice in New York."
Marshall is the lead attorney in the trademark infringement lawsuit being waged by Ripple Labs, Inc., against YouTube. The financial tech company has accused YouTube of failing to address a cryptocurrency scam on its platform.
Nathanson has defended both Barclays and the daily fantasy sports company DraftKings in litigation. Michaelson represented ValueAct Capital Master Fund after its $2.5 billion purchase of shares in Halliburton and Baker Hughes led to federal scrutiny. ValueAct settled the case with the U.S. Department of Justice in July 2016 for $11 million.
Boies Schiller managing partner Natasha Harrison wished the group well at their new firm in a statement, calling them "outstanding people and brilliant legal minds."
"While it may disappoint, it is not a surprise that competitors are going to recruit what we have cultivated and sometimes succeed," Harrison said. "We wish Damien, Laura, Andrew and Leigh every success in their new pursuits."
Since December, Boies Schiller has lost at least 25% of its partnership, according to ALM data. The firm said it is restructuring itself, and more departures would be occurring, the firm's leadership said earlier this week.
"Departures are an inevitable development as the firm continues its all-important work of restructuring and building on our position of being one of the leading and most profitable law firms in the country," Gravante said in a statement.
|Read More
King & Spalding Defers Global Partner Distributions, Reopens In London for Partners Only
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllAs Profits Rise, Law Firms Likely to Make More AI Investments in 2025
'So Many Firms' Have Yet to Announce Associate Bonuses, Underlining Big Law's Uneven Approach
5 minute readVersatility and 'Fearlessness' Drive Sullivan & Cromwell's Corporate Practice
5 minute readLaw Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Morrison & Foerster Doles Out Year-End and Special Bonuses, Raises Base Compensation for Associates
- 2Tom Girardi to Surrender to Federal Authorities on Jan. 7
- 3Husch Blackwell, Foley Among Law Firms Opening Southeast Offices This Year
- 4In Lawsuit, Ex-Google Employee Says Company’s Layoffs Targeted Parents and Others on Leave
- 5Latham, Finnegan Win $115M Muscular Dystrophy Drug Patent Verdict for Counterclaimant
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250