Firms Avoid Dire Outcomes Amid COVID-19 Pandemic, Survey Shows
Thanks to a strong first quarter, demand through the first five months of 2020 is only down 1.4%. But May told a different story than the months before it.
June 23, 2020 at 07:46 PM
4 minute read
U.S. law firms have largely succeeded—so far—in weathering a financial storm, even as the country has been battered by the COVID-19 pandemic, according to survey results released Tuesday by Wells Fargo Private Bank.
Although demand has dipped as a result of pressure on the wider economy, a strong first quarter had put firms on solid footing. Furthermore, collections are still up by 3% through May, while expenses have largely been flat. That translates to an increase income for law firm equity partners.
"Through the five-month period, the industry has fared pretty well," said Joe Mendola, senior director of sales for Wells Fargo Private Bank Legal Specialty Group.
Wells Fargo surveyed 72 firms at the end of May, 52 in the Am Law 100 and the balance either Am Law 200 or regional firms.
On the aggregate, demand was only down by 1.4% since the start of the year. But looking at May alone, the impact of the pandemic is clear: demand has dropped by 10.4%, compared to May 2019. While May demand dipped by 6.4% from April, it's important to note there were also two fewer billing days in the latter month. Still, the economy is not expected to recover immediately either.
"There's no doubt that the crisis is affecting demand," Mendola said. "That will be felt increasingly so over the next couple of months."
And there are ominous signs surrounding collections, too. Inventory was up by 7% at the end of May compared to the same period in 2019. That figure, combined with the 1.4% slide in demand, suggests that the pace of collections is slowing. Clients are clearly looking to manage their cash more carefully, according to Mendola.
But he also flagged the relatively modest cuts to staffing as a heartening sign, particularly when compared to the scalpel that firm leaders wielded in the Great Recession. The number of associates employed dipped by just 0.9%. Non-legal staff positions dropped by 4.1%, but Mendola said that his conversations suggested the bulk of these cuts were in roles that did not lend themselves to remote work.
"That's a little bit of a difference from past economic downturns. Firms have not reacted with large cuts overall. It could very well be that expectation that there will be a pick up in the latter part of the year from pent-up demand," he said.
Mendola added that judicious cuts to partner distributions have also put firms in a position of comfort. Over 50% of firms surveyed elected to delay or reduce these payments. This was likely aided by the timing of the crisis. When the severity of the dislocations from the pandemic revealed itself in the middle of March, most final distributions from 2019 had not yet been paid. And the higher-than-anticipated demand early in the year also helped firms accumulate more cash than they likely had in their projections.
As a consequence, 90% of the firms in the survey show three months or more coverage of monthly expenses excluding partner draws.
Cuts to discretionary expenses like travel and entertainment, partner retreats, marketing, recruiting and training are also making a significant difference for savings.
"It's certainly more than law firm leadership expected," Mendola said. "That's been beneficial."
The impact of the pandemic on a practice by practice basis is less surprising. Transactional practices have suffered, while bankruptcy, labor and employment, and banking work has boomed.
I don't think this crisis is going to impact all firms equally, and it really depends on where firms may have some of their larger concentrations," Mendola said.
|Read More
Growth Slowed for New York's Elite Law Firms Even Before the Pandemic Hit
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllA Look at Big Law Partner Donors to Trump and Harris in California
Wilson Sonsini Hit With Disability Discrimination Suit by Ex-Assistant
Trending Stories
- 1Infant Formula Judge Sanctions Kirkland's Jim Hurst: 'Overtly Crossed the Lines'
- 2Guarantees Are Back, Whether Law Firms Want to Talk About Them or Not
- 3Election 2024: Nationwide Judicial Races and Ballot Measures to Watch
- 4How I Made Practice Group Chair: 'If You Love What You Do and Put the Time and Effort Into It, You Will Excel,' Says Lisa Saul of Forde & O'Meara
- 5Abbott, Mead Johnson Win Defense Verdict Over Preemie Infant Formula
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250