Jenner & Block Hits Back at Chicago Landlord, Says It's Owed $840,000 in Rent Credit
Jenner & Block's counterclaims come as law firms across the country are feeling the financial pressures of the COVID-19 pandemic.
June 23, 2020 at 05:03 PM
4 minute read
Jenner & Block on Tuesday shot back at claims by its landlord in Chicago that it owes nearly $3.8 million in unpaid rent, saying the plaintiff actually owes the firm more than $840,000 in credit on its rent.
In a 40-page answer filed in Cook County Circuit Court, the Chicago-based law firm alleged that its lease with the plaintiff, an affiliate of the real estate investment management firm known as Heitman, has abatement provisions that cover unforeseen events like the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic.
"Years ago, we negotiated a lease that provides flexibility for circumstances like this one when our workforce works from home because we are unable to use our Chicago office space as intended," said David Bradford, the acting chair of Jenner's litigation department and one of the attorneys representing the firm in this lawsuit. "We are meeting our obligations under our lease agreement."
Jenner asserted that the landlord is the one who owes money in this situation. Once the abatement provisions and other credits are applied, Hart 353 North Clark LLC owes the firm "a residual credit of over $840,000 after paying all rent due through June 30, 2020," the law firm asserted in its filing.
Jenner's counterclaims come as law firms across the country are feeling the financial pressures of the pandemic. In an effort to relieve some of that pressure, law firms have been reaching out to their landlords for some sort of rent relief. The filings between Jenner and Heitman's affiliate indicate that those negotiations have hit a stumbling block.
According to its lawsuit, Jenner is an anchor tenant of 353 North Clark St., which opened in 2009 in the River North neighborhood, which is across the river from the downtown Loop area, where several government buildings are located, including state and federal courthouses.
The firm's lease began in 2009 and will expire in 2024. Over that period of time, the firm said it is obligated to pay more than $185 million in base rent plus reimbursement for real estate taxes and other costs. Jenner said it has 579 individuals working on nine floors, consisting of 270,000 square feet; the law firm can also sublease other floors in the building.
The firm said it has not used at least 89% of its space since March 16 after it reduced the number of people working in its Chicago office to a "skeleton crew" of 12.
Jenner's co-managing partner, Randy Mehrberg, has asserted that the firm is in a very strong financial position and that "this dispute is exclusively about the enforcement of that provision in the lease." A spokeswoman also said earlier this month the firm is paying rent at its other office locations in London, Los Angeles, New York and Washington, D.C.
Jenner's overall revenue grew by 1.5% to $448 million in 2019, reversing four years of sliding revenues. In March, Thomas Perrelli, a former associate U.S. attorney general and a co-chairman of Jenner & Block's government controversies and public policy litigation practice, became the firm's newest chairman.
The firm has been on a hiring spree of sorts. In late April, Jenner announced the July 1 return of Andrew Weissmann, a top member of Robert Mueller's special counsel team; he will co-chair the firm's investigations, compliance and defense practice. In May, the firm brought on Jennifer Amerkhail, a former Federal Energy Regulation Commission lawyer. And in June, the firm poached David Pressman, the former U.S. ambassador to the United Nations, from Boies Schiller Flexner, and David Robbins from Crowell & Moring.
Hart 353 North Clark is being represented by John Riccione and other attorneys from Taft Stettinius & Hollister. They did not respond to a request for comment as of press time.
|Read More
In an Uncertain Era for Law Firm Real Estate, Landlords Face New Pressures on Rent
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'Further Investment in Power' Will Drive Big Law Business—But What About Clean Energy Projects?
6 minute readLegal Departments Gripe About Outside Counsel but Rarely Talk to Them
4 minute readAs Profits Rise, Law Firms Likely to Make More AI Investments in 2025
Law Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Call for Nominations: Elite Trial Lawyers 2025
- 2Senate Judiciary Dems Release Report on Supreme Court Ethics
- 3Senate Confirms Last 2 of Biden's California Judicial Nominees
- 4Morrison & Foerster Doles Out Year-End and Special Bonuses, Raises Base Compensation for Associates
- 5Tom Girardi to Surrender to Federal Authorities on Jan. 7
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250