'My Daughter Should NOT Have to Deal With the Same Crap That I Have': Why Diverse Female Lawyers Stay in Big Law
The American Bar Associaton's new report, "Left Out and Left Behind," looks at the status of female lawyers of color and the reasons they leave and stay in Big Law.
June 23, 2020 at 03:48 PM
6 minute read
"I actually have a file folder that says all the reasons I need to leave, and there are emails, and sometimes I print them up, and I put in there so that whenever I do leave and I do that exit interview, I don't forget, not one thing that I could tell them as to why."
Black female lawyer, ABA report, "Left Out and Left Behind"
I'd be shocked if you don't know this, but I'll put it out there anyway: Female lawyers of color are not happy. In fact, 70% of them have left or are considering leaving the legal profession. And even for those who stick it out and make partner, the undercurrent of discontent runs deep.
That comes from the newly released American Bar Association report on female lawyers of color, which says: "While there are few women of color in the ranks of equity partner, those who stay are not necessarily staying because of job fulfillment."
The report, "Left Out and Left Behind: The Hurdles, Hassles, and Heartaches of Achieving Long-Term Legal Careers for Women of Color," looks at the experiences of 103 women of color who graduated from law school 15 or more years ago. It continues the 2006 ABA study on female lawyers of color, "The Visible Invisibility."
What's depressing is that not much has changed during the years, despite the escalating chatter about diversity and gender awareness. You know the drill: Women of color are still saddled with stereotypes and often excluded from choice assignments, mentorships, client development opportunities and other goodies for career advancement. The result: Women of color account for a paltry 2% of all equity partners.
So what's new and intriguing in the report? Not so much the reasons they leave, in my opinion, but the reasons they stay in Big Law at all. Speaking as a lapsed lawyer of Asian descent, I can think of about 101 arguments for getting the hell out. But stay? That's tough.
"I think women of color want to stay in the profession because they do enjoy it," says Eileen Letts, one of the report's authors (the others are Paulette Brown and Destiny Peery). "But at a certain point it gets tiring and exhausting. You know, we all keep that list of reasons for leaving."
Besides actually enjoying the work, the report finds that women of color stay in Big Law for financial and cultural reasons.
Unlike their white sisters, they are more likely to be single and, in the case of Black women, oftentimes the prime breadwinners in their families. Many are also first-generation professionals who bear heavy student loans and other financial responsibilities. "This dynamic puts pressure on people of color who attain the professional status to make middle- or upper-class salaries to continue making those salaries in order to provide support to their families and communities," says the report.
Moreover, some women of color feel the distinct need to serve as examples in a space where there are few. "This pull to be available as role models and mentors, in representational and interactive ways, was enough for some women to overcome their own personal struggles," says the report. As one Latinx woman puts it in the report: "I refuse to leave because my continued presence is beneficial for younger generations. I also try to be the mentor that I wanted when I started out. My daughter should NOT have to deal with the same crap that I have."
All of which points to an obvious elephant in the room: White female privilege—that is, women of color have very different experiences than those of white women.
Indeed, the report talks about how women's groups, which tend to be predominantly white, are often blind to intersectionality. Women of color are told that "gender comes first and/or that race and ethnicity is a distraction from getting work done on gender." And while white women "see the gender gap clearly" in pay inequality, they're "less likely to realize that women of color are paid less than they are or otherwise experience the workplace or the profession differently due to the combination of gender and race."
White women are less supportive of policies that focus on diversity rather than gender. The report says "only 52% of white women believed in making supporting or advocating diversity a criterion for compensation decisions for executives, but 67% supported legislation that ensures equal pay based on gender."
Despite the differences between white women and those of color, the report's authors caution not to lose sight of the real culprit. "The problem was not created by women or other groups but the people in power," says co-author and former ABA president Brown. "We clearly need to have better working relationships between women of color and white women, but that shouldn't be the focus," Letts adds. "What's important in the report is that women of color lack mentors and opportunities to play in the big league."
But that's been the same lament forever, so what makes the authors think that this latest report will have an impact? "The timing of this report couldn't be better," say both Brown and Letts. "There's a united front now and a recognition of the mistreatment of people of color, particularly Blacks," Letts says. "It's not only about police mistreatment but how people of color are treated on the corporate side." Adds Brown: "I'm hopeful that people are taking a deeper look at discrimination. I think right now people are more receptive."
The powers-that-be are probably as receptive as they'll ever be, but the question is what actions they'll take and how bold those actions will be.
"By the time the next report comes out, I'll be in old folks home," Brown says. She adds wistfully, "And I'd like to see dramatic change by then."
Twitter: @lawcareerist
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllMore Big Law Firms Rush to Match Associate Bonuses, While Some Offer Potential for Even More
Holland & Knight, Akin, Crowell, Barnes and Day Pitney Add to DC Practices
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1'Disease-Causing Bacteria': Colgate and Tom’s of Maine Face Toothpaste Class Action
- 2Trump's SEC Overhaul: What It Means for Big Law Capital Markets, Crypto Work
- 3Armstrong Teasdale's London Creditors Face Big Losses
- 4Texas Court Invalidates SEC’s Dealer Rule, Siding with Crypto Advocates
- 5Quinn Emanuel Has Thrived in China. Will Trump Help Boost Its Fortunes?
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250