Do 'Real Men' Work Remotely?
If managers mandate that lawyers and staff must march back to the office, flexible work arrangements—long associated with women—will lose their hard-fought legitimacy won during the pandemic.
June 25, 2020 at 03:43 PM
4 minute read
I hate to blame President Donald Trump for everything to do with toxic masculinity but, hey, why not? He's always telling us how red-blooded American men should behave, and his loudest message these days is this: Real men don't wear face masks during pandemics. He doesn't, and neither does his sycophant-in-chief Mike Pence.
Tough-guy Trump has been on a rampage to reopen businesses. And now that states are lifting stay-at-home orders, I wonder if the corollary to his no-mask rule is that real men go back to the office.
So what happens then? While men storm the office like intrepid soldiers, working women will be the sole minders on the homefront. Women will miss out on all those critical bonding opportunities and be more sidelined than before. So I'll give you 10 guesses as to whose career will go down the toilet.
Juggling work and home demands has been exhausting during the coronavirus, but the one positive development is that husbands have been helping more on the homefront. According to Council on Contemporary Families, men are "doing more housework and child care during the pandemic than before it began, leading to more equal sharing of domestic labor." And even in Japan, where men "do fewer hours of household chores and child care than in any of the globe's wealthiest nations," men started doing more home chores during the coronavirus, reports The New York Times.
The progress made during the pandemic has been small and fragile, but could it be completely wiped out once firms reopen and men "volunteer" to go back?
"Long hours and face-time bias are the hallmarks of modern American ideal worker culture that has disadvantaged women and caregivers, and made it difficult for men to step out of the traditional role of breadwinner to engage more at home," says Brigid Schulte, the author of "Overwhelmed."
Indeed, much depends on the culture at work. If managers mandate that workers march back to the office, flexible work arrangements—long associated with women—will lose their hard-fought legitimacy.
Sadly, though, I've been hearing rumblings from some partners that they'd like underlings to return to their desks like the old days. "I'm noticing that some associates are billing 10 hours for something that should take six hours to draft," complains one partner. Another was even more blunt: "I want to see them in the office where I can monitor their productivity."
It's also troubling that firms seem oblivious about how reopening offices will likely put working moms at a disadvantage. "Why don't law firms consider when to reopen based on when child care will reopen?" asks a female Big Law partner. Instead, she says, "law firms are discussing things like public transportation options and real estate refinancing based on staggered staff," without "a whiff of consideration about school reopenings."
Still, there's hope that the workplace is already altered by the coronavirus and that working from home is no longer associated with gender. "Managers who at one time were biased toward face-time work are now seeing just how much productive work can get done, even under such extreme and trying situations," Schulte says.
"I think a lot of employers are going to open at less than full capacity," says the female partner, stressing that no one in her firm—male or female—seems eager to return. And even if people do decide to return eventually, she hopes that working couples will do so on a more equal basis.
"Wouldn't it be woke of the millennials for the mom to work at home one week, then the dad the next?" she says. But, she adds, "Not holding my breath."
Email: [email protected]. On Twitter: @lawcareerist.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllAs Big Law Walks a Tightrope, Herbert Smith Freehills Refuses to Lose Its Footing
8 minute readHoly Grail: Can Changing Big Law Recruiting, Hiring and Training Lead to Greater Retention?
10 minute readTrending Stories
- 1'Largest Retail Data Breach in History'? Hot Topic and Affiliated Brands Sued for Alleged Failure to Prevent Data Breach Linked to Snowflake Software
- 2Former President of New York State Bar, and the New York Bar Foundation, Dies As He Entered 70th Year as Attorney
- 3Legal Advocates in Uproar Upon Release of Footage Showing CO's Beat Black Inmate Before His Death
- 4Longtime Baker & Hostetler Partner, Former White House Counsel David Rivkin Dies at 68
- 5Court System Seeks Public Comment on E-Filing for Annual Report
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250