Do 'Real Men' Work Remotely?
If managers mandate that lawyers and staff must march back to the office, flexible work arrangements—long associated with women—will lose their hard-fought legitimacy won during the pandemic.
June 25, 2020 at 03:43 PM
4 minute read
I hate to blame President Donald Trump for everything to do with toxic masculinity but, hey, why not? He's always telling us how red-blooded American men should behave, and his loudest message these days is this: Real men don't wear face masks during pandemics. He doesn't, and neither does his sycophant-in-chief Mike Pence.
Tough-guy Trump has been on a rampage to reopen businesses. And now that states are lifting stay-at-home orders, I wonder if the corollary to his no-mask rule is that real men go back to the office.
So what happens then? While men storm the office like intrepid soldiers, working women will be the sole minders on the homefront. Women will miss out on all those critical bonding opportunities and be more sidelined than before. So I'll give you 10 guesses as to whose career will go down the toilet.
Juggling work and home demands has been exhausting during the coronavirus, but the one positive development is that husbands have been helping more on the homefront. According to Council on Contemporary Families, men are "doing more housework and child care during the pandemic than before it began, leading to more equal sharing of domestic labor." And even in Japan, where men "do fewer hours of household chores and child care than in any of the globe's wealthiest nations," men started doing more home chores during the coronavirus, reports The New York Times.
The progress made during the pandemic has been small and fragile, but could it be completely wiped out once firms reopen and men "volunteer" to go back?
"Long hours and face-time bias are the hallmarks of modern American ideal worker culture that has disadvantaged women and caregivers, and made it difficult for men to step out of the traditional role of breadwinner to engage more at home," says Brigid Schulte, the author of "Overwhelmed."
Indeed, much depends on the culture at work. If managers mandate that workers march back to the office, flexible work arrangements—long associated with women—will lose their hard-fought legitimacy.
Sadly, though, I've been hearing rumblings from some partners that they'd like underlings to return to their desks like the old days. "I'm noticing that some associates are billing 10 hours for something that should take six hours to draft," complains one partner. Another was even more blunt: "I want to see them in the office where I can monitor their productivity."
It's also troubling that firms seem oblivious about how reopening offices will likely put working moms at a disadvantage. "Why don't law firms consider when to reopen based on when child care will reopen?" asks a female Big Law partner. Instead, she says, "law firms are discussing things like public transportation options and real estate refinancing based on staggered staff," without "a whiff of consideration about school reopenings."
Still, there's hope that the workplace is already altered by the coronavirus and that working from home is no longer associated with gender. "Managers who at one time were biased toward face-time work are now seeing just how much productive work can get done, even under such extreme and trying situations," Schulte says.
"I think a lot of employers are going to open at less than full capacity," says the female partner, stressing that no one in her firm—male or female—seems eager to return. And even if people do decide to return eventually, she hopes that working couples will do so on a more equal basis.
"Wouldn't it be woke of the millennials for the mom to work at home one week, then the dad the next?" she says. But, she adds, "Not holding my breath."
Email: [email protected]. On Twitter: @lawcareerist.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllChange Is Coming With the New Trump Era. For Big Law, Change Is Already Here
6 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Hogan Lovells Hires White & Case Corporate and Finance Team in Italy
- 2New York District Attorneys Endorse Governor's Proposed Rollback of Discovery Reforms
- 3Greenberg Traurig Launches Munich Office with Eight Hires, Including McDermott Group
- 4Midlevel Appellate Court Reinstates New York's Voting Rights Act
- 5Consumer Protection Suit Cleared to Go Forward Against Irritating Eye Serum
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250