An Overnight Shift: How the Pandemic Has Radically Changed the Role of Practice Leader
After-hours calls, movie nights with family and an uncertain future: DLA Piper New York real estate co-chair Chris Smith dishes on how the current crisis has affected his job.
June 29, 2020 at 05:00 AM
6 minute read
Editor's note: This article is part of The New View, a special report from The American Lawyer on how the coronavirus crisis is changing the way work gets done across the legal industry—now and in the future.
The novel coronavirus upended DLA Piper partner Chris Smith's practice almost immediately.
He remembers the murmurs in the office—"What's going to happen?"—when the coronavirus had yet to become a domestic threat. Then people began to social distance. And then, in mid-March, DLA leadership made the decision to move the workforce remote.
"I was pushed to make sure that we were ready to go, that I and my team knew what was expected," says Smith, who co-leads DLA's New York real estate practice. "I felt like it happened overnight."
The pandemic has upturned the entire legal industry and the world at large at a breakneck speed. Business closures and economic free-fall have transformed practices in all firms, Smith's included. And not only have the matters changed, but the way legal services are delivered has been altered entirely.
Smith's practice, the way he works and how he views the future of the law have been refashioned by the pandemic. He went from putting together deals and finding financing for clients to advising his clients at all hours on nonpaying tenants, plummeting valuations and lenders. He is not alone.
But many are optimistic that the economy isn't as fundamentally damaged as it was in 2008, and they see a small bounce-back in the real estate market as capital waits in the wings.
|Big Questions, Few Answers
The adjustment to remote work did not come naturally to Smith, who made the first lateral move of his career in 2018, when he left Shearman & Sterling at age 67.
"Some of us, including myself, are a little slower at that than we probably should have been because we've been dependent on administrative assistants and associates to do some of these things," Smith says.
But he has been impressed with the ease of shifting his practice remotely. Since Smith left the office in March, he has been working from his home in upstate New York with his wife and two adult children. He has loved having his children around—the family recently watched "Top Gun" for movie night.
Before the coronavirus made its way to U.S. shores, Smith primarily worked on typical real estate matters: financing, ground leasing and acquisitions. Now, his practice has been divided into two buckets.
He first wrapped up the big deals that were in the pipeline and were carried through to the end. Nearly everything else has been advising: What rights do landlords have if tenants refuse to pay? How should clients handle evaluations, which changed significantly as the economy tanked? How should clients deal with lenders?
"Big questions and not a lot of easy answers," Smith says. "All this advisory stuff became, very quickly, front and center. It clearly grew at an exponential rate until people got a sense of what's going to happen and how it's happening."
In this advisory role, his job has become a nearly 24/7 endeavor. Clients call late into the night now, as late as 11:30 p.m. Remote work has eroded norms, as the hours and days blend into one another.
Volume has not dropped, Smith says. Between pipeline projects and advisory work, he and his team have stayed just as busy as they were before the pandemic. But not everybody has been as fortunate. An ALM survey of nearly 300 attorneys found that more than half of the respondents had experienced fewer clients calls and matters as a result of the pandemic. This turmoil has led firms big and small to institute austerity measures, with some cutting pay as much as 25% for associates and staff.
Holland & Knight real estate practice group leader Joe Guay has seen a turn in his practice similar to Smith: He's handling more advisory work for landlords and hoteliers on legal questions and federal assistance, while wrapping up big deals that were already in the pipeline. He says the pandemic-induced recession has not battered the market in the same fashion as the Great Recession, which was catalyzed by the collapse of Lehman Brothers and the implosion of financial markets.
"The day before Lehman Brothers announced bankruptcy there were 15 deals on my desk, and after there was one," Guay says. "This time around, private equity and the banks are in pretty good condition."
And as states slowly begin to reopen from months of business closures, Guay and Smith are seeing signs of life. Guay's team has begun to field calls from lenders who are picking deals back up. Lenders are doling out construction loans. The firm's land use attorneys, often the first in line in many deals, are seeing business return.
"Right now, people are seeing that pricing is attractive," Guay says. "Maybe not in the third quarter, but in the fourth quarter you're going to start seeing great deal flow."
Smith, on the other hand, is a bit more pessimistic. Capital is looking for ways to enter the market, he says, but there is so much uncertainty. Investors are looking at the hospitality industry, in particular, which has seen some of the worst effects of the pandemic, with occupancy hovering between 8% and 20% at hotels and valuations taking a nosedive.
As in previous recessions, this opens the door to investors looking to scoop up distressed assets. But because of the inability to predict what this economic recovery might look like, lenders have been skittish regarding hotels. Many have chosen to wait to see how valuations shake out.
"A lot of capital that would normally borrow money is ready to go but doesn't have a lender ready," Smith says. "How will that market sort out over time? It is clear there's a lot of capital being formed."
Smith also anticipates changes to the business of law writ large. Remote working is here to stay, he says. Firms will be more flexible in work arrangements and, if not, attorneys will vote with their feet. And business development norms will have to be reconfigured as well.
"How do we play good offense in the context where everyone is remote? Is that going to put a whole new spectrum into play that we don't have now?" Smith wonders.
Like the rest of the legal industry, he'll have to wait for an answer.
Email: [email protected]
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllQuinn Emanuel Has Thrived in China. Will Trump Help Boost Its Fortunes?
Law Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Attorneys ‘On the Move’: Morrison Cohen Adds White Collar Partner; Corporate/Securities Partner Joins Olshan
- 2Jury Says $118M: Netlist Wins Another Patent Verdict Against Samsung
- 3Big Law Communications, Media Attorneys Brace For Changes Under Trump
- 4Will England Accept that Digital Assets Are ‘Property’?
- 5Congress and Courts Are Considering Litigation Financing: Is Disclosure Imminent?
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250