Law Firms Are Raking in Millions From Pandemic-Era Retail Bankruptcies
Several Am Law 100 firms are reaping the rewards from some of this spring's most active bankruptcies, including J. Crew, Neiman Marcus and J.C. Penney—some to the tune of more than $10 million.
July 06, 2020 at 01:41 PM
4 minute read
The legal industry has been preparing for years for an uptick in restructuring work. The coronavirus pandemic has quickly turned all that anticipation into reality—and enormous revenue.
Recent prefiling fee statements in some of the spring's biggest Chapter 11 bankruptcies show that some Am Law 100 firms stand to gain tens of millions of dollars each for their work with Neiman Marcus, J. Crew and other retail restructurings as hourly billing rates rise at the associate, counsel and partner ranks.
Luxury retailer Neiman Marcus, which filed for Chapter 11 protection in the Southern District of Texas on May 7, paid Kirkland & Ellis, debtor's counsel, more than $14 million in two advance payment retainers in March, according to court documents. Kirkland has not yet filed any monthly fee applications, but the firm said its partners are billing $1,075 to $1,845 per hour; of counsel are billing $625 to $1,845 per hour; associates are billing $610 to $1,165 per hour; and paraprofessionals are billing $245 to $460 per hour.
Local counsel Jackson Walker, which also has yet to file its first monthly fee application, has already been paid a $30,000 retainer for prefiling work, and Neiman Marcus also paid the firm $93,000 in April for filing fee reimbursements and more than $45,000 in May for pre-petition services and fees, according to court documents.
Multiple other big firms also have a role in the Neiman Marcus bankruptcy, including Wachtell, Lipton, Rosen & Katz, which is representing the extended term loan lenders; Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison, which is representing the noteholders; and Latham & Watkins, which is representing the non-debtor parent, Neiman Marcus Group.
Kirkland and Jackson Walker are also teaming up to represent J.C. Penney, which filed Chapter 11 paperwork May 15 in the Southern District of Texas. Kirkland worked with J.C. Penney for 10 months prior to the department store chain declaring bankruptcy, according to court documents, and the company paid the firm nearly $10.9 million in advance payment retainers before the Chapter 11 filing. Co-counsel and conflicts counsel Jackson Walker has been paid a $300,000 retainer by J.C. Penney. Neither firm has filed its first monthly fee applications.
J. Crew, the first major retailer to succumb to the pandemic, shelled out $12 million to its debtors counsel, Weil, Gotshal & Manges, in the 90 days prior to its Chapter 11 petition May 4. Hunton Andrews Kurth and Milbank are also involved in the bankruptcy, as local counsel and counsel to members of an ad hoc lenders' committee, respectively. None of the firms has filed a monthly fee statement for work they have completed since the filing.
Latham is representing health retailer GNC, which filed for bankruptcy June 23 in the District of Delaware. Latham has been counseling GNC since the end of 2018, it said in court filings, and the firm received $10.2 million for work in the 90 days prior to the filing. Partners are charging $1,120 to $1,680 per hour; counsel are charging $1,085 to $1,560; associates are charging $590 to $1,105; professional staff are charging $250 to $850; and paralegals are charging $250 to $540. GNC has also paid the firm a $500,000 evergreen retainer, according to court documents.
GNC co-debtors counsel Young Conaway Stargatt & Taylor, whose lawyers are billing $400 to $970 per hour, received $1.14 million for work in the 90 days prior to the Chapter 11 filing, and to replenish its retainer.
In comparatively smaller Chapter 11 proceedings, discount retailer Tuesday Morning, which filed for Chapter 11 protection May 27 in the Northern District of Texas, has paid debtor's counsel Haynes and Boone more than $1.2 million in prefiling fees, along with a $507,500 retainer, according to court documents. Lawyers on the case are charging much less than their bankruptcy counterparts at Kirkland, Weil and others: two partners are charging $875 and $1,025 per hour; counsel are charging $700 per hour; entry-level associates are charging $460 per hour; and paralegals are charging $385 per hour.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllActions Speak Louder Than Words: Law Firms Shrink From 'Performative' Statements
6 minute readNorton Rose Lawyers Accused of Accessing Confidential Material in Internal IT Probe
3 minute readLaw Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1How to Support Law Firm Profitability: Train Partners Up
- 2Elon Musk Names Microsoft, Calif. AG to Amended OpenAI Suit
- 3Trump’s Plan to Purge Democracy
- 4Baltimore City Govt., After Winning Opioid Jury Trial, Preparing to Demand an Additional $11B for Abatement Costs
- 5X Joins Legal Attack on California's New Deepfakes Law
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250