Chicago Law Firms Raked in Hundreds of Millions in PPP Loans, Cite Preserving Jobs
The range of Chicago firms that received government assistance in April ranged from Am Law 200 contenders to bet-the-company litigators to influential, local personal-injury law firms that have set records with their court victories.
July 08, 2020 at 03:47 PM
4 minute read
At least 73 law firms based in Chicago borrowed between $120-268 million from the federal government in an effort to keep lawyers and staff on the payrolls at the outset of the COVID-19 pandemic.
That money from the Paycheck Protection Program would safeguard at least 8,400 law firm jobs, according to the applications law firms filed with the U.S. Small Business Administration, which released information about the PPP recipients earlier this week.
The range of Chicago firms that received government assistance in April ranged from Am Law 200 contenders like Schiff Hardin to bet-the-company litigators at Bartlit Beck to influential, local personal-injury law firms that have set records with their court victories, like Corboy & Demetrio, Romanucci & Blandin and Power Rogers.
A number of Chicago-based law firms said they were able to stave off having to lay off or furlough employees because they received a PPP loan.
"We chose to utilize this PPP option to help us avoid layoffs, furloughs or reductions in salaries to those who would be impacted the most, our associates, paralegals and staff," said Gus Siller, the president of IP boutique Brinks Gilson Lione, in a statement. In applying for a loan worth between $5-10 million, Brinks Gilson said 178 jobs would be retained.
But similar to their counterparts on the Am Law 200, Brinks Gilson and others have cut salaries in addition to receiving multimillion-dollar PPP loans. Siller said the firm reduced compensation for its shareholders. Ditto for Freeborn & Peters—co-managing partner William Russell said the firm's owners and highest-paid employees took "substantial pay cuts and draw reductions for the benefit of the firm."
"As a result, Freeborn has avoided any furloughs or layoffs and is surviving the COVID environment successfully," Russell said in a statement.
Scott Fisher, the managing partner of Neal, Gerber & Eisenberg, expressed similar sentiments—he said the firm implemented a "myriad" of cost-cutting and austerity measures.
"These measures, coupled with the PPP funds, have helped to ensure that no NGE employee has been furloughed or laid off due to the COVID-19 pandemic," Fisher said in a statement.
A PPP loan is structured in a way that discourages companies from laying off employees after they receive it. The SBA will forgive the entirety of the loan's principal if, eight weeks after receiving the money, a company keeps all employees on the payroll and the loan is used for compensation, rent, mortgage interest or utilities.
If a company does take the PPP loan and lays off employees anyway—or cuts their pay by more than 25%—then it will have to pay back a portion of the principal.
Chicago-based Schiff Hardin accepted a $5-10 million PPP loan April 6 to help retain 321 employees, according to the SBA. Ten days later, the firm announced it would be laying off a small number of staff, cut the salaries of most lawyers and staffers who make more than $100,000 by 15%, and then reduce a smaller cohort of attorneys' pay by 50%.
Schiff Hardin is one of at least nine Am Law 200 firms that received the million-dollar loans and cut jobs or salaries before or after they received the loans.
The Chicago legal market is going through the same turmoil the national market is going through, according to Kent Zimmermann, a Chicago-based law firm consultant with the Zeughauser Group. Outside of the highest-performing firms, Chicago firm leaders are projecting a 10-15% drop in revenue this year, he said.
Practice areas like bankruptcy and restructuring, white-collar work, class action litigation, intellectual property and privacy work are showing promise in Chicago and nationwide, Zimmermann said. Additionally, private equity work is also starting to come back for some firms, he added.
"Firms that were underperforming the market continue to underperform," Zimmermann said. "A small subset are so weak they could fail."
|Read More
Big Law Firms Got Millions of Dollars to Preserve Payroll. Some Made Cuts Anyway
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllQuinn Emanuel Has Thrived in China. Will Trump Help Boost Its Fortunes?
Law Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Gibson Dunn Sued By Crypto Client After Lateral Hire Causes Conflict of Interest
- 2Trump's Solicitor General Expected to 'Flip' Prelogar's Positions at Supreme Court
- 3Pharmacy Lawyers See Promise in NY Regulator's Curbs on PBM Industry
- 4Outgoing USPTO Director Kathi Vidal: ‘We All Want the Country to Be in a Better Place’
- 5Supreme Court Will Review Constitutionality Of FCC's Universal Service Fund
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250