Demand Falls for Lateral Partners and Associates, With 'Slowdown and Hesitation' in Hiring
A NALP survey reflects what recruiters have observed. "We're seeing a slowdown and hesitation with one-off partner moves," said one recruiter.
July 17, 2020 at 05:39 PM
4 minute read
The pandemic continues to dampen demand for laterals. Many law firms have slowed down lateral partner and associate hiring, all the while instituting pay cuts for employees, a new survey shows.
According to the newly released National Association of Law Placement survey, nearly 70% of firms have reduced lateral associate hiring in the period from March through May, while 40% have reduced their lateral partner hiring. The survey, which also shows that many are delaying new associate start dates, was conducted on June 18-30 and based on the responses of 356 law offices and 167 law schools.
"All of the firms are looking at everything through the lens of the Great Recession, and when the coronavirus pandemic began, everything [in terms of lateral hiring] froze up initially just so firms could get their bearings," said Amdie Mengistu, senior consultant of partner practice at Whistler Partners.
While there's still an appetite among big firms for group hires, demand for single-partner hires has declined, said Lauren Drake, a Washington, D.C., partner at recruiting boutique Macrae.
"We're seeing a slowdown and hesitation with one-off partner moves, and firms are a lot more cautious about hiring from the government; that's also been a real dip," she said.
And associates — similar to new hires from the government — require more investment from firms, especially in their first few years, she said. Firms are feeling uncertain about their future, potentially explaining why the demand for associate hiring has dropped off more than partners.
Still, Mengistu and Drake both said they were keeping up a busy recruiting schedule. As prospective laterals are more open to switching firms and onboarding virtually, lateral activity is once again on the uptick, they both observed.
"It feels like things have stabilized a bit, or at least plateaued," Mengistu said. "During the last few months of the pandemic, compared to 2008, we've had less layoffs and more lateral hiring. It hasn't been as catastrophic as we expected."
Meanwhile, many firms are continuing with pay cuts throughout the year. NALP found that about 62% of responding law firms have implemented salary cuts and/or delays in partner draws since March 1.
The uncertainty in the legal industry goes hand-in-hand with the wave of coronavirus infections, which are causing states such as Texas and California to reshutter, while law firm offices in former virus epicenters such as New York are staying cautious. Many firms have planned a gradual return to in-person work by opening their doors to a small number of employees and defaulting to remote work for the foreseeable future.
According to the NALP study, 35% of law firm offices were partially reopened or planned to be by the end of June, but an additional 39% of offices said they were unsure of when they would reopen.
Law firm caution—health, financial or otherwise—is also beginning to affect recent graduates. According to the NALP study, 50% of firms have not established a start date for incoming first-year associates, while 62% of firms with established start dates are not bringing in new associates until January 2021. The study also found that 85.2% of law schools had Class of 2020 graduates reported rescinded offers from private practice.
As for summer associates, according to the latest survey, 87% of firms hosted a partially or fully remote summer program in 2020, according to the study, while 95% shortened the length of their programs.
Read More:
Incoming Law Firm Associates Unsure When Their Jobs Will Start
Pandemic Slows Lateral Hiring as Firms Look for Guaranteed Winners
A 2nd Wave of Potential Layoffs Looms Over Law Firms' 3rd Quarter
Some Big Law Firms Are Waiting to Reopen Their New York Offices
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllPaul Hastings, Recruiting From Davis Polk, Adds Capital Markets Attorney
3 minute readKirkland Is Entering a New Market. Will Its Rates Get a Warm Welcome?
5 minute readGoodwin Procter Relocates to Renewable-Powered Office in San Francisco’s Financial District
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250