Demand Falls for Lateral Partners and Associates, With 'Slowdown and Hesitation' in Hiring
A NALP survey reflects what recruiters have observed. "We're seeing a slowdown and hesitation with one-off partner moves," said one recruiter.
July 17, 2020 at 05:39 PM
4 minute read
The pandemic continues to dampen demand for laterals. Many law firms have slowed down lateral partner and associate hiring, all the while instituting pay cuts for employees, a new survey shows.
According to the newly released National Association of Law Placement survey, nearly 70% of firms have reduced lateral associate hiring in the period from March through May, while 40% have reduced their lateral partner hiring. The survey, which also shows that many are delaying new associate start dates, was conducted on June 18-30 and based on the responses of 356 law offices and 167 law schools.
"All of the firms are looking at everything through the lens of the Great Recession, and when the coronavirus pandemic began, everything [in terms of lateral hiring] froze up initially just so firms could get their bearings," said Amdie Mengistu, senior consultant of partner practice at Whistler Partners.
While there's still an appetite among big firms for group hires, demand for single-partner hires has declined, said Lauren Drake, a Washington, D.C., partner at recruiting boutique Macrae.
"We're seeing a slowdown and hesitation with one-off partner moves, and firms are a lot more cautious about hiring from the government; that's also been a real dip," she said.
And associates — similar to new hires from the government — require more investment from firms, especially in their first few years, she said. Firms are feeling uncertain about their future, potentially explaining why the demand for associate hiring has dropped off more than partners.
Still, Mengistu and Drake both said they were keeping up a busy recruiting schedule. As prospective laterals are more open to switching firms and onboarding virtually, lateral activity is once again on the uptick, they both observed.
"It feels like things have stabilized a bit, or at least plateaued," Mengistu said. "During the last few months of the pandemic, compared to 2008, we've had less layoffs and more lateral hiring. It hasn't been as catastrophic as we expected."
Meanwhile, many firms are continuing with pay cuts throughout the year. NALP found that about 62% of responding law firms have implemented salary cuts and/or delays in partner draws since March 1.
The uncertainty in the legal industry goes hand-in-hand with the wave of coronavirus infections, which are causing states such as Texas and California to reshutter, while law firm offices in former virus epicenters such as New York are staying cautious. Many firms have planned a gradual return to in-person work by opening their doors to a small number of employees and defaulting to remote work for the foreseeable future.
According to the NALP study, 35% of law firm offices were partially reopened or planned to be by the end of June, but an additional 39% of offices said they were unsure of when they would reopen.
Law firm caution—health, financial or otherwise—is also beginning to affect recent graduates. According to the NALP study, 50% of firms have not established a start date for incoming first-year associates, while 62% of firms with established start dates are not bringing in new associates until January 2021. The study also found that 85.2% of law schools had Class of 2020 graduates reported rescinded offers from private practice.
As for summer associates, according to the latest survey, 87% of firms hosted a partially or fully remote summer program in 2020, according to the study, while 95% shortened the length of their programs.
|Read More:
Incoming Law Firm Associates Unsure When Their Jobs Will Start
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'Further Investment in Power' Will Drive Big Law Business—But What About Clean Energy Projects?
6 minute readLegal Departments Gripe About Outside Counsel but Rarely Talk to Them
4 minute readAs Profits Rise, Law Firms Likely to Make More AI Investments in 2025
Trending Stories
- 1Arnold & Porter Matches Market Year-End Bonus, Requires Billable Threshold for Special Bonuses
- 2Advising 'Capital-Intensive Spaces' Fuels Corporate Practice Growth For Haynes and Boone
- 3Big Law’s Year—as Told in Commentaries
- 4Pa. Hospital Agrees to $16M Settlement Following High Schooler's Improper Discharge
- 5Connecticut Movers: Year-End Promotions, Hires and an Office Opening
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250