The Black Lawyer's Burden: Calling Out Racism
Harvard Business Review offers a roadmap on how Blacks can broach racism in the workplace—and it's not easy.
July 17, 2020 at 03:47 PM
4 minute read
Corporate America has a new mantra: "If you see something, say something."
That used to refer to untended packages left on the subway or suspicious people wearing big vests in crowds. Now, it's also what good corporate citizens are supposed to do when they witness harassment, bullying or racism in the workplace.
Arguably, with Black Lives Matter gaining traction, this is the perfect moment to call out colleagues, managers and even clients who make offensive remarks or demonstrate intolerance. Institutions are knocking themselves out about how much they value diversity, so why shouldn't we tell it like it is?
Sounds empowering, but who are we kidding?
It's hard for anyone to raise thorny topics like sexism or racism in the workplace. And if you're a woman or a person of color making the charge, it's almost impossible.
I hear this from women and diverse lawyers all the time. In my own circle of diverse female friends, we often share stories of sexism and racism and debate at length what actions to take.
And guess what? We tend to let it go. We know from experience that those who complain seldom get satisfaction, especially if the offender brings in business or carries clout. Sure, management will go through the motion of hearing us out, but how often is the offender (and I'm talking about someone with a troubling history) demoted or ousted? And if the complainer persists in pressing the issue, guess who'll be labeled a troublemaker?
A recent article in the Harvard Business Review talks about this problem, particularly for Blacks. "As high as these stakes are for white people who speak up, they're higher if you're Black," the authors, James Detert and Laura Morgan Roberts of University of Virginia Darden School of Business, wrote. "Raise these issues and you risk being seen as biased, overly emotional (e.g., too angry), and a host of other negative stereotypes."
The HBR article attempts to offer a realistic road map for how minorities can broach racism at work. For starters, it suggests that they enlist others to their cause: "Find like-minded colleagues and raise the issue together. People we studied reported that speaking up as a group on workplace issues had more of an impact because it was hard to write them off as 'one disgruntled person.'"
I think that's very good advice, but I'd go further. Rather than enlist only minorities, it would likely be more effective to enlist members of the majority. Indeed, it often feels that it is the burden of people of color to raise awareness of bias—and it shouldn't be.
The HBR authors offer other suggestions and warnings about raising issues of race in the workplace:
- Don't get too emotional (but don't suppress emotions either): "Revealing the full extent of your rage or despair in front of those with power sets you up to be dismissed or punished for being 'too emotional.'"
- Expect negative reactions: "Demanding improvements in racial equity stands a good chance of evoking defensiveness and fear."
- Be inclusive and make your argument compelling: "Delivering your message as inclusively as possible can help with the sense of divisiveness often associated with calls for racial justice." The message should be, "'We are evolving together' rather than 'I am revolting against you.' This framing highlights collective progress."
- Follow Up: "If you need those people to stand with you for real change to take root, you'll want to check in."
It's all sound advice, but so exhausting. Although the authors write, "our aim in providing this advice is not to place an additional burden on people of color," it feels exactly like that. It seems minorities have to walk on eggshells and perform jiujitsu to talk about racial injustice in their own workplace, lest they come off as too angry, strident or demanding. Then, they have to follow up on the conversation, because, chances are, management will need a lot of nudging on these issues.
Which brings up the authors' final point: "If you have attempted to implement these suggestions, and still see little to no progress, take stock of where you are and where you wish to be. It might be time to look around your organization for a new team or assignment with leaders and allies who are willing to join you in this work."
And people wonder why Black lawyers don't stick around.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllLaw Firms Funnel Millions to Congressional Races, Though Skew Toward Dems
4 minute readPartner Pay Transparency Is Eroding, Even if 'Black Box' Systems Haven't Caught On
6 minute readDLA Piper Exhibited 'Far From Exemplary Conduct' in Patent Infringement Case, Judge Finds
Law Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Infant Formula Judge Sanctions Kirkland's Jim Hurst: 'Overtly Crossed the Lines'
- 2Abbott, Mead Johnson Win Defense Verdict Over Preemie Infant Formula
- 3Preparing Your Law Firm for 2025: Smart Ways to Embrace AI & Other Technologies
- 4Greenberg Traurig Initiates String of Suits Following JPMorgan Chase's 'Infinite Money Glitch'
- 5Data-Driven Legal Strategies
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250