Holland & Knight Sued Over Botched Wire Transfer
The plaintiffs alleged the law firm could have done more to prevent a cyber scam and a $3 million fraud.
July 22, 2020 at 07:50 PM
3 minute read
The story has been updated to include a written statement from Holland & Knight.
Holland & Knight is being sued for its role in a botched wire transfer in which $3 million was sent to a fraudulent account based in Hong Kong this year.
The lawsuit alleges the law firm could have done more to prevent the cyber scam and a $3 million fraud.
The suit, which was first filed in Utah state court in June and then moved to federal court this week, centers around a stock transaction between plaintiffs Sorenson Impact Foundation and the James Lee Sorenson Family Foundation and defendants Holland & Knight, Continental Stock Transfer and Tassel Parent Inc.
In December, Holland & Knight was hired to handle a stock sale between the plaintiffs and Tassel Parent, valued at $3,124,940, according to the suit. Defendant Continental Stock Transfer acted as the transfer agent, the complaint says.
A month later, a "malicious third party" intercepted emails between the plaintiffs and defendants, the complaint continues. The scammers assumed the identity of the plaintiffs, falsified correspondence and documents and, in late January, asked Holland & Knight to wire the $3 million to a different account based in Hong Kong and identifying itself as "Wemakos Furniture Co. Limited," the complaint continues.
In February, the scammers then forged a false letter of transmittal, stock certificates and authorization letter. The fake documents listed the plaintiffs' bank as "Bank of China HK LTD" and the owner/beneficiary as "Hongkong Wemakos Furniture Trading Co. Limited."
The transaction was executed and the plaintiffs have not recovered the $3 million, says the complaint.
The plaintiffs, suing the law firm for breach of contract and breach of fiduciary duty, allege that Holland & Knight did not vet the fraudulent account or contact the plaintiffs, a safeguard laid out in the merger agreement between the firm and plaintiffs, which may have prevented the mistake.
"Plaintiffs and defendants would have discovered the fraudulent emails, fraudulent Letter of Transmittal and Letter of Authorization if H&K and Continental had contacted plaintiffs in person over the phone to confirm the fraudulent wire instructions," the complaint reads.
The plaintiffs in the suit, which surfaced on Law.com's Legal Radar, are represented by Cameron Hancock and Thad Seegmiller of Kirton McConkie.
In a statement on Thursday, Holland & Knight spokeswoman Olivia Hoch said the firm's "information technology system was not compromised in any way." She added that the plaintiffs were not clients, and "the firm acted on wiring instructions received from the plaintiff's email system by providing the instructions to the paying agent."
Sign up for Law.com's Legal Radar to keep up with the latest news and lawsuits in a free, personalized news feed. Track federal litigation and who's getting the work by industry, practice area, law firm, company and region.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllThree Akin Sports Lawyers Jump to Employment Firm Littler Mendelson
Brownstein Adds Former Interior Secretary, Offering 'Strategic Counsel' During New Trump Term
2 minute readLaw Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Med Mal Defense Win Stands as State Appeals Court Rejects Arguments Over Blocked Cross-Examination
- 2Rejecting 'Blind Adherence to Outdated Precedent,’ US Judge Goes His Own Way on Attorney Fees
- 3African Law Firm Under Investigation For AI-Generated Case References
- 4Indiana AG Accuses Big Pharma of Inflating EpiPens Price by 600%, Lawsuit Says
- 5Up-and-Comer Scores First Legal Chief Post With Baltimore Orioles, the Team He Cheered for as Kid
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250