Multiple Staff at Sullivan & Cromwell Laid Off, Sources Say
The changes come as the firm has offered voluntary retirement packages and parted ways with several staff directors.
July 24, 2020 at 05:00 AM
4 minute read
Wall Street firm Sullivan & Cromwell has laid off multiple staff in several departments in recent months, according to six sources. The changes come as the firm has offered voluntary retirement packages and parted ways with several staff directors.
The layoffs number up to about 50 staff members over the past three months, said some sources.
The layoffs touched a variety of departments within the firm, including events, marketing and temporary workers, sources said, and laid off staff were offered a severance package of two weeks' pay for every year served at the firm.
Apart from the layoffs, many older employees were given the option of an early retirement through what the firm called its voluntary retirement program, said some sources, including one who said the number of employees given that option was around 100. Those eligible needed to be at least 55 years of age, the sources said, and have a tenure at the firm that allowed their age and service time to add up to 70.
Meanwhile, six chief or director-level personnel have also left the firm over the past several months, although it is not clear whether any of those were directly tied to the larger round of staff layoffs.
Sources said the firm parted ways with its chiefs or director's of knowledge management, global business development, internal auditing, hospitality services, legal personnel and global contracts and special projects. LinkedIn profiles for four of the six personnel show they stopped working at the firm this year, while sources confirmed the other two departures.
The six former directors or chief personnel either declined to comment or could not be reached for comment.
In an email, Sullivan & Cromwell's executive director, Karen Braun, declined to comment, citing firm policy not to comment on personnel matters.
In particular, she declined to comment as to whether any of the layoffs were part of an outsourcing deal the firm struck with HBR Consulting that pushed its many of its IT needs to the consulting firm. Sources said the technology department within the firm went largely untouched in this round of cuts.
Sullivan & Cromwell's average profits per partner ranked fourth in the Am Law 100, at $4.65 million last year. That's more than double the average Am Law 100 PEP of $2.09 million, according to ALM data.
S&C is certainly not alone in cutting back on expenses and personnel. A slew of layoffs were reported in major firms over the last three months during the pandemic, and another round may be on its way in the third quarter. Bryan Cave Leighton Paisner, for example, confirmed on July 15 it was cutting lawyer and staff positions across its global business.
According to a survey conducted in May by the National Association for Law Placement, about 10% of law firm respondents reported layoffs or furloughs for personnel in talent, recruiting, professional development or diversity and inclusion departments.
Some firms, though, are starting to roll back austerity measures as revenue performance outpaced initial expectations.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllPaul Hastings, Recruiting From Davis Polk, Adds Capital Markets Attorney
3 minute readKirkland Is Entering a New Market. Will Its Rates Get a Warm Welcome?
5 minute readGoodwin Procter Relocates to Renewable-Powered Office in San Francisco’s Financial District
Law Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Pogo Stick Maker Wants Financing Company to Pay $20M After Bailing Out Client
- 2Goldman Sachs Secures Dismissal of Celebrity Manager's Lawsuit Over Failed Deal
- 3Trump Moves to Withdraw Applications to Halt Now-Completed Sentencing
- 4Trump's RTO Mandate May Have Some Gov't Lawyers Polishing Their Resumes
- 5A Judge Is Raising Questions About Docket Rotation
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250