Multiple Staff at Sullivan & Cromwell Laid Off, Sources Say
The changes come as the firm has offered voluntary retirement packages and parted ways with several staff directors.
July 24, 2020 at 05:00 AM
4 minute read
Wall Street firm Sullivan & Cromwell has laid off multiple staff in several departments in recent months, according to six sources. The changes come as the firm has offered voluntary retirement packages and parted ways with several staff directors.
The layoffs number up to about 50 staff members over the past three months, said some sources.
The layoffs touched a variety of departments within the firm, including events, marketing and temporary workers, sources said, and laid off staff were offered a severance package of two weeks' pay for every year served at the firm.
Apart from the layoffs, many older employees were given the option of an early retirement through what the firm called its voluntary retirement program, said some sources, including one who said the number of employees given that option was around 100. Those eligible needed to be at least 55 years of age, the sources said, and have a tenure at the firm that allowed their age and service time to add up to 70.
Meanwhile, six chief or director-level personnel have also left the firm over the past several months, although it is not clear whether any of those were directly tied to the larger round of staff layoffs.
Sources said the firm parted ways with its chiefs or director's of knowledge management, global business development, internal auditing, hospitality services, legal personnel and global contracts and special projects. LinkedIn profiles for four of the six personnel show they stopped working at the firm this year, while sources confirmed the other two departures.
The six former directors or chief personnel either declined to comment or could not be reached for comment.
In an email, Sullivan & Cromwell's executive director, Karen Braun, declined to comment, citing firm policy not to comment on personnel matters.
In particular, she declined to comment as to whether any of the layoffs were part of an outsourcing deal the firm struck with HBR Consulting that pushed its many of its IT needs to the consulting firm. Sources said the technology department within the firm went largely untouched in this round of cuts.
Sullivan & Cromwell's average profits per partner ranked fourth in the Am Law 100, at $4.65 million last year. That's more than double the average Am Law 100 PEP of $2.09 million, according to ALM data.
S&C is certainly not alone in cutting back on expenses and personnel. A slew of layoffs were reported in major firms over the last three months during the pandemic, and another round may be on its way in the third quarter. Bryan Cave Leighton Paisner, for example, confirmed on July 15 it was cutting lawyer and staff positions across its global business.
According to a survey conducted in May by the National Association for Law Placement, about 10% of law firm respondents reported layoffs or furloughs for personnel in talent, recruiting, professional development or diversity and inclusion departments.
Some firms, though, are starting to roll back austerity measures as revenue performance outpaced initial expectations.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'Further Investment in Power' Will Drive Big Law Business—But What About Clean Energy Projects?
6 minute readLegal Departments Gripe About Outside Counsel but Rarely Talk to Them
4 minute readAs Profits Rise, Law Firms Likely to Make More AI Investments in 2025
Law Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Avoiding Franchisor Failures: Be Cautious and Do Your Research
- 2De-Mystifying the Ethics of the Attorney Transition Process, Part 1
- 3Alex Spiro Accuses Prosecutors of 'Unethical' Comments in Adams' Bribery Case
- 4Cannabis Took a Hit on Red Wednesday, but Hope Is On the Way
- 5Ben Brafman Defending Celebrity Rabbi in Lawsuit by Miami Hotel
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250