Fennemore Craig Inks Merger Deal With 50-Lawyer Calif. Firm
The tie-up would create a combined firm with up to about $95 million in combined gross revenue and a focus on agricultural and environmental clients.
July 28, 2020 at 03:45 PM
4 minute read
Two midsize firms in the Mountain West and California, Fennemore Craig and Dowling Aaron, have voted to merge to create a 180-lawyer practice with 10 offices.
The merger, effective Oct. 1, was announced Tuesday, after the firms' lawyers voted to approve the deal earlier this month. The tie-up would create a combined firm with up to about $95 million in combined gross revenue, including about $20 million from Dowling Aaron, said Fennemore Craig's CEO, James Goodnow, who will remain chief executive of the combined firm.
Fennemore, which has about 130 lawyers, and Dowling Aaron, with about 50 lawyers, decided to merge, despite the pandemic and remote-working environment, because the firms' practice areas, cultures and finances aligned, he said. The combined firm will have a base of roughly 6,000 clients, across all practice areas, he noted.
Dowling Aaron, with its four offices in California, has a strong agricultural legal business, as the state's Central Valley is the largest food-producing region in the United States, Goodnow said, noting the region is also a water hub for the western United States.
Fennemore, meanwhile, has a strong cross-border practice with agriculture business and has a "deep bench of water law" attorneys.
"We're going to be a dominant player in agriculture business and water law in the western U.S," he said. "It's going to open the doors to more opportunity."
The firms have no duplicate offices, he said. Dowling Aaron has offices in Fresno, Sacramento, Bakersfield and the Central Coast. The 135-year-old Fennemore Craig has six offices in Arizona, Colorado and Nevada, including Phoenix, Denver, Las Vegas, Reno, Tucson and Nogales.
The firms' lawyers started talking last fall, he said. While the merger talks slowed this year during the pandemic—when offices closed and lawyers worked remotely—the firms were determined to close the deal, he said.
"For us, it [the pandemic] did slow the process a little bit, but we didn't believe it should stop. This is a great combination that has strategic benefits for us and our clients," he said, declining to name particular clients of either firm.
The deal contrasts with the national trend of law firm mergers and acquisitions coming to a halt. "The reason you're seeing slowing M&A in the legal industry is because lawyers, by nature, are risk-averse," Goodnow said, but adding, "I would argue that this is exactly the time firms need to be acting boldly and strategically. We're going to have lots of new business opportunities."
"When I think about the pandemic, I don't think, 'let's curl up in a ball,'" Goodnow said. "I think you have to be much more proactive about finding ways to create work, finding ways to distinguish yourself from other firms and that's how we approached [the merger] with Dowling Aaron."
He noted that neither firm sought the merger out of necessity, by seeking a lifeline. "We're both coming from a strong position," and if the deal didn't happen, "both firms would continue to be strong. … But we realized that this really was a very unique opportunity where we're able to do more together than we do independently."
Dowling Aaron's president, Leigh Burnside, will join the new firm's management committee, and Fennemore's Sarah Strunk will continue as chair of the firm's board of directors. Dowling Aaron chair and partner Richard Aaron will continue in a senior position within the new firm.
The combined firm will have about 350 people, including lawyers and staff. Goodnow said the firm isn't planning on any personnel "reductions" after the merger, and he's hopeful all attorneys will move to the combined firm, noting the deal had broad support.
Besides agribusiness and environmental law, the firms noted that the merger will increase practice capabilities in business and finance, mergers and acquisitions, real estate, construction and health care. Significant during the pandemic, it will also increase their bankruptcy, estate planning, ERISA and benefits, labor relations and employment law practices, the firms said.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTreasury GC Returns to Davis Polk to Co-Chair White-Collar Defense and Investigations Practice
2 minute readKirkland & Ellis Taps Former Co-Chair of Greenberg Traurig’s Digital Infrastructure Practice
3 minute readLaw Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Midsize Firm Bressler Amery Absorbs Austin Boutique, Gaining Four Lawyers
- 2Bill Would Allow Californians to Sue Big Oil for Climate-Linked Wildfires, Floods
- 3LinkedIn Suit Says Millions of Profiles Scraped by Singapore Firm’s Fake Accounts
- 4Supreme Court Agrees to Hear Lawsuit Over FBI Raid at Wrong House
- 5What It Takes to Connect With Millennial Jurors
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250