Fennemore Craig Inks Merger Deal With 50-Lawyer Calif. Firm
The tie-up would create a combined firm with up to about $95 million in combined gross revenue and a focus on agricultural and environmental clients.
July 28, 2020 at 03:45 PM
4 minute read
Two midsize firms in the Mountain West and California, Fennemore Craig and Dowling Aaron, have voted to merge to create a 180-lawyer practice with 10 offices.
The merger, effective Oct. 1, was announced Tuesday, after the firms' lawyers voted to approve the deal earlier this month. The tie-up would create a combined firm with up to about $95 million in combined gross revenue, including about $20 million from Dowling Aaron, said Fennemore Craig's CEO, James Goodnow, who will remain chief executive of the combined firm.
Fennemore, which has about 130 lawyers, and Dowling Aaron, with about 50 lawyers, decided to merge, despite the pandemic and remote-working environment, because the firms' practice areas, cultures and finances aligned, he said. The combined firm will have a base of roughly 6,000 clients, across all practice areas, he noted.
Dowling Aaron, with its four offices in California, has a strong agricultural legal business, as the state's Central Valley is the largest food-producing region in the United States, Goodnow said, noting the region is also a water hub for the western United States.
Fennemore, meanwhile, has a strong cross-border practice with agriculture business and has a "deep bench of water law" attorneys.
"We're going to be a dominant player in agriculture business and water law in the western U.S," he said. "It's going to open the doors to more opportunity."
The firms have no duplicate offices, he said. Dowling Aaron has offices in Fresno, Sacramento, Bakersfield and the Central Coast. The 135-year-old Fennemore Craig has six offices in Arizona, Colorado and Nevada, including Phoenix, Denver, Las Vegas, Reno, Tucson and Nogales.
The firms' lawyers started talking last fall, he said. While the merger talks slowed this year during the pandemic—when offices closed and lawyers worked remotely—the firms were determined to close the deal, he said.
"For us, it [the pandemic] did slow the process a little bit, but we didn't believe it should stop. This is a great combination that has strategic benefits for us and our clients," he said, declining to name particular clients of either firm.
The deal contrasts with the national trend of law firm mergers and acquisitions coming to a halt. "The reason you're seeing slowing M&A in the legal industry is because lawyers, by nature, are risk-averse," Goodnow said, but adding, "I would argue that this is exactly the time firms need to be acting boldly and strategically. We're going to have lots of new business opportunities."
"When I think about the pandemic, I don't think, 'let's curl up in a ball,'" Goodnow said. "I think you have to be much more proactive about finding ways to create work, finding ways to distinguish yourself from other firms and that's how we approached [the merger] with Dowling Aaron."
He noted that neither firm sought the merger out of necessity, by seeking a lifeline. "We're both coming from a strong position," and if the deal didn't happen, "both firms would continue to be strong. … But we realized that this really was a very unique opportunity where we're able to do more together than we do independently."
Dowling Aaron's president, Leigh Burnside, will join the new firm's management committee, and Fennemore's Sarah Strunk will continue as chair of the firm's board of directors. Dowling Aaron chair and partner Richard Aaron will continue in a senior position within the new firm.
The combined firm will have about 350 people, including lawyers and staff. Goodnow said the firm isn't planning on any personnel "reductions" after the merger, and he's hopeful all attorneys will move to the combined firm, noting the deal had broad support.
Besides agribusiness and environmental law, the firms noted that the merger will increase practice capabilities in business and finance, mergers and acquisitions, real estate, construction and health care. Significant during the pandemic, it will also increase their bankruptcy, estate planning, ERISA and benefits, labor relations and employment law practices, the firms said.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'Further Investment in Power' Will Drive Big Law Business—But What About Clean Energy Projects?
6 minute readLegal Departments Gripe About Outside Counsel but Rarely Talk to Them
4 minute readAs Profits Rise, Law Firms Likely to Make More AI Investments in 2025
Law Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Call for Nominations: Elite Trial Lawyers 2025
- 2Senate Judiciary Dems Release Report on Supreme Court Ethics
- 3Senate Confirms Last 2 of Biden's California Judicial Nominees
- 4Morrison & Foerster Doles Out Year-End and Special Bonuses, Raises Base Compensation for Associates
- 5Tom Girardi to Surrender to Federal Authorities on Jan. 7
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250