The Latest: Breastfeeding on Zoom
Breastfeeding your baby on Zoom is empowering—and it's trending in certain sectors of corporate America. Would you?
July 28, 2020 at 09:34 PM
4 minute read
Watch out for lactating lawyers!
I know breastfeeding is a perennially hot subject, but these days it's sizzling. The latest controversy in legal circles is that some states aren't providing accommodations for lactating bar exam takers. In Oklahoma, for example, "one applicant with a four-month-old child was told that she should do whatever she needs to regarding pumping in an open room with 300 other test takers," tweeted LadyLawyerDiaries indignantly.
The American Civil Liberties Union is also paying attention, issuing a report card that grades states on their bar exam lactation policy.
While some women are upset that institutions aren't providing lactators the dignity of privacy, another school of thought has emerged: Dare to go bare. At a time when the boundaries between home and work are almost nonexistent, why are working women still hiding this perfectly normal activity?
The rationale is this: Colleagues and clients have seen each other's dirty laundry—literally—since the onset of COVID-19 and Zoom meetings. If there's ever a moment to show the world that you can negotiate a complicated deal while nursing a baby, this is it.
Breastfeeding your baby on Zoom is arguably the empowering thing to do—and it's trending in certain sectors of corporate America.
"Like the breastfeeding selfie, the breastfeeding Zoom call could normalize the act and just maybe make it a bit easier for working mothers," reports Vogue.
Jada Shapiro, a maternal-health expert and founder of Boober, a "pregnancy to postpartum care" resource site, told Vogue: "I'm a firm believer in nursing everywhere. You are just feeding your child. Unless your company has a policy that there's no eating during meetings, you should be able to nurse during a meeting."
As far as I know, no firm prohibits eating during Zoom or any other type of meetings. So are lawyer-moms ready to feed their babies in whatever form the occasion demands?
My guess: No way. From my dealings, Big Law types—male or female—are an uptight, zipped-up lot. Most female lawyers I know wouldn't even wear a bikini, much less bare their breast on a business call.
But I am wrong! Either lawyers are less prudish these days or COVID has revolutionized the attitude about the division of the personal and the professional.
The handful of lawyers I contacted say breastfeeding on Zoom is fine. In fact, the prevalent attitude was "whatever."
"Those women who want to do the video should feel free," says a Big Law female partner in New York. "Some women like it—probably the same ones who felt empowered by baring their breasts and BFing in restaurants. Power to them."
Another female partner at a major firm says, "If the Zoom meeting is populated by folks who she would feel comfortable breastfeeding in front of in real life, then I don't see why not." Left unanswered is what colleagues a woman would feel "comfortable breastfeeding in front of in real life." Female colleagues only? Or certain men—like a mentor or a trusted male underling?
"I'm not even sure anyone would notice anymore," says a female associate at a big firm. "I've seen all sorts of stuff on Zoom meetings—kids having a meltdown, dogs puking, people with their bare bellies hanging out. Honestly, who cares anymore?"
One woman, however, drew a line between different types of lactation activity. While she was totally cool about breastfeeding in front of colleagues, she says pumping is inappropriate. "Pumping is a hyper-clinical and awkward experience that's more like a personal hygiene activity."
But why would people want to air more of their lives on Zoom than they already have? The smarter thing is to use lactation as a pretext to get out of those virtual meetings. "The fatigue that comes with constant viewing of yourself along with others on a screen is psychologically real," says a female partner. "If breastfeeding and/or pumping isn't a good enough reason, I don't know what is."
That said, this same partner admits that those who breastfeed on Zoom are probably trying to make a point. The goal is "to normalize the behavior, reduce stigma and be that outspoken person who can do it."
In other words, while breastfeeding might be perfectly normal, doing it on Zoom is unlikely a perfectly spontaneous gesture.
In any case, who's ready for her closeup?
Twitter: @lawcareerist
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllQuinn Emanuel Has Thrived in China. Will Trump Help Boost Its Fortunes?
Trending Stories
- 1Gibson Dunn Sued By Crypto Client After Lateral Hire Causes Conflict of Interest
- 2Trump's Solicitor General Expected to 'Flip' Prelogar's Positions at Supreme Court
- 3Pharmacy Lawyers See Promise in NY Regulator's Curbs on PBM Industry
- 4Outgoing USPTO Director Kathi Vidal: ‘We All Want the Country to Be in a Better Place’
- 5Supreme Court Will Review Constitutionality Of FCC's Universal Service Fund
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250