Simpson Thacher Seeks $8M From Landlord in Rent Abatement Dispute
Simpson Thacher's suit argues the state's June 22 reopening phase for offices in New York placed restrictions that still made it untenable to use the space.
July 29, 2020 at 07:28 AM
4 minute read
The original version of this story was published on New York Law Journal
Simpson Thacher & Bartlett is suing its New York landlord, alleging it has refused to acknowledge the law firm's rights to rent abatement, leading to $8 million in damages.
Simpson Thacher "remains unable to continue the reasonable operation of its business," said the firm's breach-of-contract suit filed this week in Manhattan Supreme Court against landlord VBGO 425 Lexington Ave. LLC.
Amid the pandemic, rent disputes between commercial tenants and landlords are now ripe across the country. Jenner & Block is similarly in litigation with its Chicago landlord, with the firm also citing rent abatement provisions in its lease. But Simpson Thacher's lawsuit stands out as a rare public dispute between an Am Law 20 firm and its landlord. The firm's average profits per partner last year were $4.42 million, while it grossed about $1.6 billion in revenue, according to American Lawyer data.
According to its suit, Simpson Thacher signed a lease in 1987 that included a "relatively unique clause" for rent abatement circumstances.
Under the lease, the firm said, Simpson Thacher is entitled to rent abatement when it's unable to use the offices for at least 60 days due to "force majeure" events, which includes circumstances where the government steps in and preempts the tenant's right to occupy its space related to a national or public emergency.
The firm said it complied with COVID-19 shutdown orders from the government, "and has been unable to use and has vacated its law offices at 425 Lexington Avenue since March 22," the suit said, noting the firm has been unable "to continue the reasonable operation of its business" for over 60 days.
New York City on June 22 entered phase two of the state's reopening schedule, which allowed law firms to reopen at 50% capacity. But Simpson Thacher said that the state's order placed "substantial other social distancing and hygiene restrictions" on its access, including restrictions for gatherings in enclosed spaces, workplace activity, movement and commerce, the use of protective equipment, screening and testing, tracing and tracking of employee contact and communications and safety plans.
"For these reasons, [Simpson Thacher] is still operating within the governmental restrictions" from the state's orders, the suit said, and "has been unable to use and has vacated the premises."
The landlord, the firm said, "has refused to acknowledge [Simpson Thacher's] rights to rent abatement under the lease" and has also refused to reimburse Simpson Thacher for rent paid by the firm.
A representative for the landlord could not immediately be reached for comment. According to public records, 425 Lexington was bought in recent years by a real estate investment and advisory firm, Vanbarton Group, whose general counsel Justin Kleinman, did not immediately respond to an email seeking comment.
Simpson Thacher is represented by Patrick Bonner Jr. and John Menz at Menz Bonner Komar & Koenigsberg in White Plains.
A representative for Simpson Thacher said in a statement that "While we typically do not comment on litigation, we can confirm that we have filed a claim for rent abatement against our NY landlord to preserve our rights under a provision in our lease agreement and have continued to pay rent while reserving our rights."
|This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'Further Investment in Power' Will Drive Big Law Business—But What About Clean Energy Projects?
6 minute readLegal Departments Gripe About Outside Counsel but Rarely Talk to Them
4 minute readAs Profits Rise, Law Firms Likely to Make More AI Investments in 2025
Law Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Call for Nominations: Elite Trial Lawyers 2025
- 2Senate Judiciary Dems Release Report on Supreme Court Ethics
- 3Senate Confirms Last 2 of Biden's California Judicial Nominees
- 4Morrison & Foerster Doles Out Year-End and Special Bonuses, Raises Base Compensation for Associates
- 5Tom Girardi to Surrender to Federal Authorities on Jan. 7
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250