Baker Botts, Cadwalader to Restore Pay After COVID-19 Cuts
Both Am Law 100 firms had cut non-partner lawyer and staff pay as economic uncertainties related to the coronavirus pandemic hit the legal industry.
July 30, 2020 at 04:43 PM
4 minute read
Am Law 100 firms Baker Botts and Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft are restoring pay after they imposed cuts a few months ago as the economy turned south due to the COVID-19 pandemic.
The managing partners of both firms said in letters to colleagues that the austerity measures implemented months ago put their firms in a position to restore pay, even as uncertainty in the economy continues.
"As the pandemic continues and parts of the U.S. experience a substantial increase in COVID-19 cases, it does not feel as though we are 'out of the woods' with respect to this health and economic crisis, nor is it even clear that we have seen its peak impact," Cadwalader managing partner Patrick Quinn wrote Wednesday.
But Quinn wrote that "although the crisis is not over," the salary reductions, along with other cost-containment measures, put the firm in a position to withstand its effects.
While the pandemic is still affecting some areas of New York-based Cadwalader, Quinn wrote, many lawyers are busier than projected before the virus.
Also on Wednesday, Baker Botts managing partner John Martin wrote in an internal email that "despite the unprecedented environment we have been operating in during the pandemic, through the hard work of many and as a result of the measures we have implemented across the firm, we have exceeded our post-COVID financial performance forecast to date."
Martin announced that effective Sept. 1, Baker Botts will restore 50% of the compensation reductions put into effect May 1.
In May, Baker Botts, based in Houston, imposed salary cuts on associates and staff making more than $70,000.
In addition to restoring half of the pay cuts, Martin wrote that Baker Botts will pay interim bonuses for non-partner timekeepers who have made "exceptional contributions" for the May 1 to July 31 period. More than 200 lawyers are expected to receive the bonus in August.
Recognizing the challenges of working from home, the firm also will pay a $1,000 stipend to all non-partner timekeepers and staff who use the firm's technology systems "to enhance your working from home set-ups" and continue to provide good client service.
When announcing the temporary pay reductions three months ago, Martin wrote in an email to the firm that partners had agreed to compensation reductions "to absorb the bulk of the financial impact." He did not address partner compensation in the Wednesday communication, and a spokesman declined to discuss it.
Cadwalader will reverse temporary compensation reductions ranging from 10% to 25% for attorneys and staff, effective Aug. 1. The firm had said when announcing the pay cuts that it hoped to reinstate normal compensation after four months.
However, Quinn noted that this continues to be a difficult period for clients and the firm.
"We will continue to monitor the impact of the crisis and make decisions in the weeks and months to come that are in the best interests of our firm, our people and our clients," he wrote.
In April, Cadwalader cut associate salaries by 25% and imposed pay cuts of 10% to 25% on staff in response to the coronavirus, in addition to halting partner pay.
The firm confirmed Thursday that partner distributions will also return to normal.
A number of other large and midsize firms also recently announced they would restore at least some of their compensation cuts, including Lowenstein Sandler, Cozen O'Connor, Bryan Cave Leighton Paisner and Munck Wilson Mandala, with some of the firms also citing higher than expected demand and financial performance.
Read More:
Cadwalader Halts Partner Pay, Cuts Associate and Staff Compensation
Baker Botts Cuts Pay Due to COVID-19 But Avoids Layoffs or Furloughs
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'Ridiculously Busy': Several Law Firms Position Themselves as Go-To Experts on Trump’s Executive Orders
5 minute readHolland & Knight Hires Former Davis Wright Tremaine Managing Partner in Seattle
3 minute readAm Law 200 Firms Announce Wave of D.C. Hires in White-Collar, Antitrust, Litigation Practices
3 minute readPaul Hastings Hires Music Industry Practice Chair From Willkie in Los Angeles
Law Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250