Baker Botts, Cadwalader to Restore Pay After COVID-19 Cuts
Both Am Law 100 firms had cut non-partner lawyer and staff pay as economic uncertainties related to the coronavirus pandemic hit the legal industry.
July 30, 2020 at 04:43 PM
4 minute read
Am Law 100 firms Baker Botts and Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft are restoring pay after they imposed cuts a few months ago as the economy turned south due to the COVID-19 pandemic.
The managing partners of both firms said in letters to colleagues that the austerity measures implemented months ago put their firms in a position to restore pay, even as uncertainty in the economy continues.
"As the pandemic continues and parts of the U.S. experience a substantial increase in COVID-19 cases, it does not feel as though we are 'out of the woods' with respect to this health and economic crisis, nor is it even clear that we have seen its peak impact," Cadwalader managing partner Patrick Quinn wrote Wednesday.
But Quinn wrote that "although the crisis is not over," the salary reductions, along with other cost-containment measures, put the firm in a position to withstand its effects.
While the pandemic is still affecting some areas of New York-based Cadwalader, Quinn wrote, many lawyers are busier than projected before the virus.
Also on Wednesday, Baker Botts managing partner John Martin wrote in an internal email that "despite the unprecedented environment we have been operating in during the pandemic, through the hard work of many and as a result of the measures we have implemented across the firm, we have exceeded our post-COVID financial performance forecast to date."
Martin announced that effective Sept. 1, Baker Botts will restore 50% of the compensation reductions put into effect May 1.
In May, Baker Botts, based in Houston, imposed salary cuts on associates and staff making more than $70,000.
In addition to restoring half of the pay cuts, Martin wrote that Baker Botts will pay interim bonuses for non-partner timekeepers who have made "exceptional contributions" for the May 1 to July 31 period. More than 200 lawyers are expected to receive the bonus in August.
Recognizing the challenges of working from home, the firm also will pay a $1,000 stipend to all non-partner timekeepers and staff who use the firm's technology systems "to enhance your working from home set-ups" and continue to provide good client service.
When announcing the temporary pay reductions three months ago, Martin wrote in an email to the firm that partners had agreed to compensation reductions "to absorb the bulk of the financial impact." He did not address partner compensation in the Wednesday communication, and a spokesman declined to discuss it.
Cadwalader will reverse temporary compensation reductions ranging from 10% to 25% for attorneys and staff, effective Aug. 1. The firm had said when announcing the pay cuts that it hoped to reinstate normal compensation after four months.
However, Quinn noted that this continues to be a difficult period for clients and the firm.
"We will continue to monitor the impact of the crisis and make decisions in the weeks and months to come that are in the best interests of our firm, our people and our clients," he wrote.
In April, Cadwalader cut associate salaries by 25% and imposed pay cuts of 10% to 25% on staff in response to the coronavirus, in addition to halting partner pay.
The firm confirmed Thursday that partner distributions will also return to normal.
A number of other large and midsize firms also recently announced they would restore at least some of their compensation cuts, including Lowenstein Sandler, Cozen O'Connor, Bryan Cave Leighton Paisner and Munck Wilson Mandala, with some of the firms also citing higher than expected demand and financial performance.
Read More:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllQuinn Emanuel Has Thrived in China. Will Trump Help Boost Its Fortunes?
Law Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Gibson Dunn Sued By Crypto Client After Lateral Hire Causes Conflict of Interest
- 2Trump's Solicitor General Expected to 'Flip' Prelogar's Positions at Supreme Court
- 3Pharmacy Lawyers See Promise in NY Regulator's Curbs on PBM Industry
- 4Outgoing USPTO Director Kathi Vidal: ‘We All Want the Country to Be in a Better Place’
- 5Supreme Court Will Review Constitutionality Of FCC's Universal Service Fund
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250