Perkins Coie, Anticipating 'Hybrid' Work, to Scale Back Office Footprint
The firm is planning a "hybrid workplace" model allowing a mix of in-office and remote work come October, with office sharing, hoteling and reverse hoteling.
April 09, 2021 at 03:57 PM
4 minute read
Perkins Coie leaders told firm personnel Friday that they can continue working remotely until October, but when they do return, they'll find that the firm is well into the process of changing how it uses its space. Those firm changes include a large reduction in total office footprint and adopting a "hybrid workplace" model after October for a mix of in-office and remote work. The Seattle-based firm has already turned to single-sized offices in four locations. And four other offices have recently or will soon see space reductions that will collectively result in a 24% contraction in the firm's total footprint. The elimination of 71,282 square feet in Seattle; Palo Alto, California; Denver; and Chicago is equivalent to more than 25 tennis courts. While the moves to single-sized offices in San Francisco, San Diego, New York and a newly expanded floor in Washington, D.C., came before the arrival of COVID-19, the pandemic accelerated the firm's approach to redefining space, the firm indicated. "Single-sized offices started begging the question of how we use our space in general," said Perkins Coie chief of business operations Tammy Baldwin. "We're now pushing it even further. The pandemic gave it a lot of energy." While the firm's offices are currently open for attorneys and staff who wish to use them, subject to social distancing and other protocols, the firm anticipates that Friday's extension of remote work will be the last one. But leaders are also planning on adopting a "hybrid workplace" model allowing a mix of in-office and remote work come October. According to Baldwin, that means a mix of office sharing, hoteling and reverse hoteling for many in the firm. When two people both anticipate they'll be in the office on fixed schedules that don't overlap, they can share an office and keep their physical items in the same place. Under hoteling, others who wish to come in on a less predictable basis can take a free office when they do appear. And via reverse hoteling, offices that are in regular use by one individual will open up as "surge" or "overflow" space when the office holder is out. Baldwin said that education has proved crucial to overturning internal resistance to sharing space. "It's just conversation after conversation. There's no magic to this," she said. "We're talking to people over and over, and after a while, people are seeing it. For associates and staff, it comes with the knowledge that I'm going to have the flexibility I need." While they feature less private space, the new offices have what Baldwin describes as more "we" space. That includes collaboration areas and conference rooms, as well as a mother's room, prayer room and respite room in the new Chicago office, which is being built out this year, also on a single-sized office model. "We've been able to maintain our culture of collaboration," she said. "Now, the challenge for us as we design space is what makes you want to come back." There are clearly financial benefits from this reorientation, both in terms of cost savings in the short term and what Baldwin called "cost avoidance" in the long term as the firm avoids being yoked to underused real estate. And looking forward, the firm is committing to single-sized offices in all new builds and remodels. Perkins Coie isn't alone in the trend of reducing footprints. Sherry Cushman, who heads the legal sector advisory group for commercial real estate services firm Cushman & Wakefield, recently noted that one San Francisco firm recently decided to shift all its employees to shared offices when they return. And she said that other firms she's worked with are looking to scale back anywhere from 10% to 40% percent. |
Read More:
Law Firms Are Planning Major Office Changes for Post-Pandemic Era It's a Buyer's Market for Law Firm Real Estate, as Many Mull Office Space Options Phila. Firm Leaders Are Getting Serious About Cutting Office Space
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllQuinn Emanuel Has Thrived in China. Will Trump Help Boost Its Fortunes?
Law Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Gibson Dunn Sued By Crypto Client After Lateral Hire Causes Conflict of Interest
- 2Trump's Solicitor General Expected to 'Flip' Prelogar's Positions at Supreme Court
- 3Pharmacy Lawyers See Promise in NY Regulator's Curbs on PBM Industry
- 4Outgoing USPTO Director Kathi Vidal: ‘We All Want the Country to Be in a Better Place’
- 5Supreme Court Will Review Constitutionality Of FCC's Universal Service Fund
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250