Credit: Kevin Fales Faced With a Fractured Economy, the Am Law 200 Not Only Survived—They Grew
In a year of incredible uncertainty that brought greater challenges to the Second Hundred than the Am Law 100, this diverse group of firms made it through the wilderness.
May 18, 2021 at 10:01 AM
0 minute read
A Midwest powerhouse in its first year after a blockbuster merger. A single-office elite litigation boutique. A sprawling insurance defense legacy firm that's expanded into transactional work and beyond. An IP specialty shop. And a firm that's placed a bet on multidisciplinary practice, with a growing number of consultants working alongside lawyers.
What data are you leveraging to sell strategy internally? Get the interactive Am Law 200 data exclusively with Legal Compass. This sampling of five entirely different business models found within just the first 10 spots in the Second Hundred is a microcosm of the diversity of the group. And yet, as varied as these firms are, there's an argument to be made that there's more analytical value in looking at them collectively than there is in applying the same exercise to the Am Law 100.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All
'Never Been More Dynamic': Big Law Leaders Reflect on 2024 and Expectations Next Year
7 minute read
For Paul Weiss, Progress Means 'Embracing the Uncomfortable Reality'
5 minute read
Law Firms Mentioned
- Taft Stettinius & Hollister
- Munger, Tolles & Olson
- Choate, Hall & Stewart
- Cole, Schotz, Meisel, Forman & Leonard
- Lathrop Gage
- Thompson Knight
- Herrick Feinstein
- Waller Lansden Dortch & Davis
- Arent Fox
- Boies Schiller Flexner
- Kirkland & Ellis
- Hinckley Allen Snyder
- Schiff Hardin
- Offit Kurman
- Briggs and Morgan
- Baker, Donelson, Bearman, Caldwell & Berkowitz, PC
- Holland & Knight LLP
- Gray, Plant, Mooty, Mooty & Bennett, P.A.
- Kobre Kim
- Irell & Manella
Trending Stories
- 1Call for Nominations: Elite Trial Lawyers 2025
- 2Senate Judiciary Dems Release Report on Supreme Court Ethics
- 3Senate Confirms Last 2 of Biden's California Judicial Nominees
- 4Morrison & Foerster Doles Out Year-End and Special Bonuses, Raises Base Compensation for Associates
- 5Tom Girardi to Surrender to Federal Authorities on Jan. 7
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250
