Law Firm Personnel Don't Want to Work in the Office. They Want to Meet and Socialize
A new survey shows most people want to work remotely a majority of the time, and go to the office about once a week.
February 09, 2022 at 03:02 PM
6 minute read
As the omicron variant begins its descent from public view, law firms are again readying themselves for a return to the office. But the past two years have changed how people in the legal community view the office: most of them don't want to be there for a majority of their work time.
Legal recruiting firm Major, Lindsey & Africa, in a follow-up flash survey to its "Lawyers' Perspectives on Returning to the Office" survey released last year, found that desire to be in the office has declined further in less than a year.
Just 27% of respondents want to be in the office three or four days a week, the survey found last month. That's down from 46% in March 2021, just 10 months before.
Still, 75% of respondents said they would like to be in the office at least one day per week.
But they don't see the office as a primary work destination.
This mindset presents a problem for law firms already in a compromised position due to ongoing talent wars. While most firms are using some sort of hybrid arrangement, many of those same firms also want their people in the office three or more days per week.
Stephanie Biderman, a partner in the associate practice at MLA and a co-author of the survey referenced above, said she wasn't surprised by the decline in desire to be in the office.
"The longer we are working remotely, the more people realize it works," she said. "Especially from a productivity and work-life balance standpoint."
She did say she thought another portion of the survey was of interest: There is not a massive push of people who want to work in a remote-only capacity.
"The percentage of people who wanted to work completely remote in March 2021 is the same (10%) that want to work remotely now," she said.
|'A Slow Adjustment'
A C-level business professional at an Am Law 100 firm, who asked not to be named so they could speak freely, said they have been back in the office periodically. "The people I talk to most often are glad we are back in the office with any regularity," they said.
"As someone who changed jobs during the pandemic, I am getting more of that water cooler time and it is helpful for relationship building," the business pro added.
They said being in the office allows for creative and spontaneous interactions that add value. So does the ability to learn from others in person, they said. But, they also said, that time in the office will now need to be focused more deliberately on interactions and work that can't be done as well remotely.
"If you are not putting people in a position to have those types of engagements when they are in the office, it's pointless to drag them out of their homes," they said.
Biderman agreed. She said it will be a challenge for law firms to propose an umbrella mandate asking for three or more days in the office after people experienced the financial success and increased flexibility of the last two years.
"It is challenging to get people to come in three days a week if their work doesn't dictate it," she said. "Associates and partners are happy to come in if there is a reason, and firms are trying to be as creative as they can do figure out ways to entice people."
Julia Shapiro, CEO and founder of Hire an Esquire, said the very nature of law firm management structure compounds the difficulty of adjusting to "X" days of the week across the firm.
Separate fiefdoms, different needs for attorneys at various stages of their careers and practice areas that have unique needs all play a part in creating a situation where a one-size-fits-all approach is difficult to implement.
"For the majority of large law firms, it's going to be a slow adjustment rather than an organized, coordinated, well-executed effort in the next couple of years," she said in an email. "The organizational structure doesn't allow for coordinated, well-executed change."
|What Is the Office Now?
It would be hard to argue that the office is canceled, especially for Big Law. In an apprenticeship-driven profession, face time with more senior personnel is key to the growth and development of younger lawyers.
Biderman, who specializes in associate recruiting, said there is a desire for many younger attorneys to be in the office.
"The juniors want to come in more than we give them credit for because they haven't had the training," she said.
But the varying needs of individual attorneys and their practice areas make an umbrella approach, such as three days a week in the office, hard to swallow for some.
"I predict from my decade-plus of watching the market that as the talent wars continue, firms will continue to make ad hoc, uncoordinated changes to accommodate remote work and much-needed associates that want to be fully remote," Shapiro said.
So what does the office become? When that coordinated response finally does manifest, what will it be?
Biderman believes a hybrid model is pretty much a given, but how that model looks could vary from firm to firm and even practice to practice.
She said partners don't want to do "bed checks" on whether people are in the office or not, so making that time worthy of a commute is paramount.
"You have to just give both associates and partners some level of independence on what is best for them and their team," she said. "Firms have to make time in the office more valuable. Training, mentorship, positive cultural events and team-building events. That is where the focus is going to have to be."
Shapiro noted that tech companies, particularly in Silicon Valley, have embraced an "in-service" model of office time.
"Someone will organize a happy hour or team collaboration because everyone wants to interact in real life," she wrote in an email. "Whether socially or to tackle a specific project where they think in-person interaction will be helpful, my guess is the future of work will be a lot of remote employees with retreats or 'in-services' in the office."
This, of course, could change if demand for legal services weakens and associates lose some of their power over firm management decisions.
Either way, Biderman contends the days of "coming into the office, shutting your door and doing work" might be over, permanently.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllLegal Departments Gripe About Outside Counsel but Rarely Talk to Them
4 minute readEckert Seamans Snags Reed Smith Global Financial Intelligence Director
3 minute read'So Many Firms' Have Yet to Announce Associate Bonuses, Underlining Big Law's Uneven Approach
5 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250