Dan Roe’s recent article in The American Lawyer recounted problematic actions by private investigators working for various law firms, showcasing investigators hired by Reed Smith on behalf of Dan Snyder and the Washington Commanders as the poster boys for rogue investigators. The questionable tactics used by these investigators were also the subject of hearings before the U.S. House of Representatives Committee on Oversight and Reform. Among other things, they reportedly approached former Commanders cheerleaders who were represented by counsel and, in one instance, an investigator who was a former DEA agent “flashed a badge” at a witness in an apparent attempt to intimidate her.
The article cites ethics experts who concluded that “lawyers may avoid being held accountable for the conduct of nonlawyer assistants so long as they don’t order or supervise the assistants’ actions.” It also suggests, in a subheading, that there are ethical “gray areas” that allow for investigative hijinks. These suggestions are not only mistaken but can’t be reconciled with the applicable and well-settled disciplinary rules.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]
