Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan and Foley & Lardner are squabbling over a bid to depose Foley chairman and CEO Daljit Doogal as part of a long-running dispute between the Am Law 100 firms over millions in fees stemming from work performed on the LeClairRyan bankruptcy.
In a Monday filing in the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, attorneys for Foley & Lardner sought a protective order to quash the deposition, calling Quinn Emanuel’s demand a “transparent attempt to annoy, harass, and place an undue burden” on the firm and its CEO. Meanwhile, Quinn Emanuel contended in its own filing that Foley & Lardner’s motion for a protective order came far too late and said there was merit to forcing Doogal to sit for a deposition currently scheduled for Thursday afternoon.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]
