Why the Future of Talent Management Could Look Very Different
With the introduction and accelerating adoption of efficiency-generating technologies, the way lawyers are recruited and developed is likely to undergo some interesting changes.
May 01, 2024 at 05:00 AM
12 minute read
Like finding a DeLorean in a barn in 1955, the legal services industry encountered a portal to its future in December 2022. Despite weathering the predicted foundational paradigm shifts presented by the inevitable migration toward AFAs (2009-2019) and forecasted dominance of ALSPs and the Big Four (2019-2022), we are now facing business model transformational forces from generative AI that have prompted more than one professional services executive to exclaim "Great Scott!" While the two prior disruptive waves have, let's say, failed to live up to the hype, this latest development could prove to be a bit more resilient depending on how stakeholders in the industry assess risk and reward.
So why is generative AI potentially more transformative than prior threats to the status quo? While it is not simple to configure or apply to bespoke purposes, it can sit in-house at firms or legal departments and map somewhat intuitively into the work being produced. Assessing what and how much traditional work can be augmented, and by which tools and approaches, is a somewhat logical process that uniquely trained specialists can perform with surprising accuracy. Herein lies the complexity, however—the skill sets required to effectively implement these procedural changes are novel in the workforce generally, and even more so in the professional services sector (for now). The work they do will likely displace measurable portions of manual work done traditionally by junior lawyers, requiring law firms to make substantial modifications to how they operate in order to stay profitable.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllAI's Place in Big Law Broadens, As Firms Embrace Fresh Uses of the Technology
Husch Blackwell Hires Former Adobe Counsel to Oversee AI Advisory Offering
3 minute readLaw Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1How Law Firms Can Make Business Services a Performance Champion
- 2'Digital Mindset': Hogan Lovells' New Global Managing Partner for Digitalization
- 3Silk Road Founder Ross Ulbricht Has New York Sentence Pardoned by Trump
- 4Settlement Allows Spouses of U.S. Citizens to Reopen Removal Proceedings
- 5CFPB Resolves Flurry of Enforcement Actions in Biden's Final Week
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250