Willkie's Wes Powell Making an Impact With 'Portable' Experience
"The more 360-degree view you acquire when thinking about problems your clients may have, the better it equips you to deal with the next problem," said Powell, a finalist for the The American Lawyer's 2024 Attorney of the Year honor.
November 12, 2024 at 12:41 PM
4 minute read
AwardsWillkie, Farr & Gallagher’s Wesley Powell chairs the firm’s antitrust and competition practice, but it is clear there is a fire within to see that those who have less—as he did growing up—are given legal representation for those most important matters.
"I grew up in a tiny town in rural Tennessee where there was a high level of poverty," said Powell, who also chairs the firm's pro bono practice, in an interview. "And I was raised Methodist. The 'do no harm' mentality of that never left me. The older I get, the more clear it becomes that I am not that far away from that town in Tennessee."
After undergrad at Vanderbilt University and while at Duke Law School, Powell met a professor who had the idea of launching a pro bono program for living wills and end-of-life counseling for those affected by the AIDS crisis.
"I have never really been without pro bono work," said Powell, a finalist for The American Lawyer's 2024 Attorney of the Year honor.
Powell's recent work includes Ciaramella v McDonald in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, which he handled with the Legal Aid Society, on behalf of Medicaid-eligible New Yorkers whose expenses associated with medically necessary dental services were not reimbursable by New York's Medicaid program, due to a coverage ban on dental implants and restrictions on dentures, root canals and crowns.
Part of the issue, according to Powell, was a rule that sounded like it could have been written in 1790: the "eight points of contact" rule, which meant that if there were four teeth (or more) on the top of one's mouth and four on the bottom that made contact with each other when the mouth was shut, then the state deemed you to have "adequate dentition." At the time, denture users were only allowed to get new ones, but only every eight years. That has now also been rectified by the suit.
"I have been involved in several impactful pro bono cases over the years, but this might have the most impact for the most people," Powell said. "If you have seriously poor dentition, you can't get jobs, and you have a much higher likelihood of obesity. It really is lifechanging."
Powell worked with the Transgender Legal Defense Fund in Lange v Houston County, where a sheriff's deputy in Houston County, Georgia, claimed she was being denied medically necessary care under her health plan. The U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Georgia ruled that the defendants could be held liable under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act. That ruling was upheld by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit last May. (Powell said the matter is entering a new phase and is not yet fully resolved). The ruling was the first time a Title VII violation was found for a health plan excluding gender-affirming care in the southern U.S., according to the plaintiffs.
Powell also litigated Toomey v. Arizona, challenging a coverage exclusion for transition-related health care on behalf of transgender individuals employed by the state. After years of litigation, in 2023, the state abandoned its policy of excluding such coverage for state employees.
As pro bono chair at Willkie, Powell oversees the efforts of more than 600 lawyers in 15 offices who are slated to do roughly 80,000 hours of pro bono work this year. And while his "day job" pays the bills, Powell said that each aspect of his work informs the other.
"Over my career, I have developed my skills as a litigator, advocate, and counselor to clients, and I think I bring all of that experience to these pro bono cases," he said. "When I think of the many hours I spent counseling Sgt. Lange, I am not talking about antitrust, but the experiences I have are portable to this work."
He said the inverse is true as well.
"The more 360-degree view you acquire when thinking about problems your clients may have, the better it equips you to deal with the next problem," he said.
"I grew up a gay kid in that town and never imagined in a million years that I would get to get married. That I would have two children," he said. "I would have laughed at you if you told me that. And I feel this motivation to find something to do for people that have less. That has never left me."
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'Ready to Respond': Wilmer's Robert Kimmitt and Covington's Stephen Rademaker Worked to Free U.S. Journalists
3 minute read'Strategy, Brains, Creativity and Passion' Drive Lori Cohen of Greenberg Traurig
Trending Stories
- 1Gibson Dunn Sued By Crypto Client After Lateral Hire Causes Conflict of Interest
- 2Trump's Solicitor General Expected to 'Flip' Prelogar's Positions at Supreme Court
- 3Pharmacy Lawyers See Promise in NY Regulator's Curbs on PBM Industry
- 4Outgoing USPTO Director Kathi Vidal: ‘We All Want the Country to Be in a Better Place’
- 5Supreme Court Will Review Constitutionality Of FCC's Universal Service Fund
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250