At least this time less adjustment was needed. The first big reworking of Italy’s insolvency laws came after massive accounting fraud was unearthed at food conglomerate Parmalat Finanziara S.p.A. in 2003. The previous insolvency regime was more than 60 years old and recognized by most as badly outdated. “Traditionally, the bankruptcy law was tailored to liquidating companies rather than restructuring them,” says Fabio Guastadisegni, a bankruptcy partner with Clifford Chance in Milan.
After the Parmalat fraud came to light, the Marzano law–named after former Italian minister of industry Antonio Marzano–was adopted by the Italian government to enable large companies to keep operating after they have filed for bankruptcy. A series of amendments to the country’s bankruptcy law between 2005 and 2007 also radically overhauled the restructuring process. Distressed companies and their advisers now have a series of options before and during bankruptcy that are designed to help companies avoid liquidation. Insolvency in Italy is looking more American–albeit with some important differences that have as much to do with Italy’s economy as with its legal system.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]