An arbitrator in Boston has ruled that Goodwin Procter must trim the $1.1 million bill of a real estate client by 55 percent, according to a story that appeared in the Boston Globe on Friday. (Hat Tip: The WSJ’s Law Blog and ABA Journal.)

The Globe notes that arbitrator Jeffrey Martin, a partner with Boston firm Burns & Levinson, determined that Goodwin Procter submitted “vague” invoices to Newton, Mass.-based Northland Investment Corporation, had “failed to provide a promised discount, and used too many of its attorneys to bill for the same legal tasks.”

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]