The other very expensive and very elegant shoe has dropped in the case of Louboutin v. Yves Saint Laurent. A panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit ruled in September that French designer Christian Louboutin’s distinctive red-soled shoes are entitled to at least limited trademark protection, reversing a lower court holding that a single color can’t be trademarked in the fashion industry. The decision also shed some light on the often-confounding doctrine of “aesthetic functionality.”
The court’s ruling made Louboutin’s attorneys very happy, with Harley Lewin of McCarter & English saying, “We got essentially what we wanted we got affirmation that Louboutin’s mark is valid and enforceable, and we now have a clear statement of the methodology that needs to be followed in cases of this kind.”
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]
