Vanessa Blum writes for The Recorder, an American Lawyer affiliate.
SAN FRANCISCO — They've tried every defensive maneuver in the accused infringer playbook, from filing a declaratory judgment action to disqualifying opposing counsel to seeking an eleventh hour stay.
Now after three years of scorched-earth litigation, lawyers for TransPerfect Global Inc. have just one more gambit — persuading a jury their client did not infringe four patents in the field of website translation or that the patents are invalid.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]
