Apple Inc.’s court-appointed antitrust monitor, Michael Bromwich, reports that after a rough start, he and Apple are getting along better now. But Apple still wants him gone, as the tech giant made clear on May 1 in an appellate brief seeking Bromwich’s removal.
Apple’s lawyers at Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher asked the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit to reverse portions of the final judgment in the e-books price-fixing litigation that led to Bromwich’s appointment. Asserting that his appointment was unconstitutional and unprecedented, they also took aim at Bromwich’s fees, complaining that his company billed Apple more than $1 million for less than six months of work.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]
