“I read about it in law school, but it is rarely done,” says Steven Seidman of Willkie Farr & Gallagher about the Pac-Man defense he employed to help Men’s Wearhouse Inc. beat back an unsolicited takeover bid by smaller rival Jos. A. Bank Inc., only to gobble up the bidder itself for $65 per share.

But the Pac-Man tactic wasn’t the only notable twist in the battle of the haberdasheries. Men’s Wearhouse ended up paying a 56 percent premium per share for Bank, thanks, perhaps, to a novel termination clause in a merger agreement between Jos. A. Bank and Eddie Bauer crafted by Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom’s Paul Schnell and Jeremy London.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]