Pennsylvania Firms Turn Efficiency Into Profits
All but two of the 13 Am Law 200 firms founded in the Keystone State saw gains in profits per partner last year.
May 22, 2018 at 09:34 AM
4 minute read
In a year of generally positive financial results for Pennsylvania law firms, leadership focused on efficiency, leading to better than average profitability gains for several of them.
Of the 13 Am Law 200 firms founded in Pennsylvania, all but two posted at least a slight gain in profits per equity partner in 2017, compared to the year before. Seven increased PPP by more than 5 percent—the amount of year-over-year PPP growth across the entire Am Law 200.
(While 15 Pennsylvania firms appear on the Am Law 200, year-to-year comparisons do not include Marshall Dennehey Warner Coleman & Goggin or Eckert Seamans Cherin & Mellott, which were not included in last year's Am Law 200.)
But revenue per lawyer increased by just half a percent on average among firms founded in Pennsylvania, even with double-digit gross revenue gains at Cozen O'Connor and Saul Ewing Arnstein & Lehr. While the majority of firms saw RPL increase year-over-year, three firms saw their RPL dip, including a decline of 15.3 percent at K&L Gates.
But large firm leaders in Pennsylvania say they are focused on growing the bottom line through various means. While a few mention specific cost-cutting measures, many highlight a focus on staffing for efficiency, project management and alternative fee arrangements.
Duane Morris chairman Matt Taylor says practice group heads at his firm have encouraged lawyers to be project managers. The firm as a whole, he says, has adopted a “nimble approach” as clients demand more creativity in billing and fees.
Blank Rome aimed to keep expense growth under 1 percent, and used separate litigation and transactional pricing teams to create better cost predictability for clients, chairman Alan Hoffman says.
Pepper Hamilton managing partner Tom Cole says his firm has been more proactive about offering alternative fee arrangements, giving clients a budget before they ask for it. The firm saw gross revenue decline slightly in 2017, bumping it down from the Am Law 100 to the Second Hundred, but chairman Tom Gallagher says the firm is more focused on “delivering profitable work,” pointing to PPP growth of 14.3 percent.
Reed Smith managing partner Sandy Thomas says the firm has continuously monitored head count against demand since shrinking its lawyer ranks in 2016. The firm aims to increase realization through its client value team.
Despite the push for efficiency, firms are not backing away from making investments.
Pepper Hamilton placed a focus on partner recruitment and talent management in 2017, implementing new C-suite roles to focus on those functions. And Fox Rothschild's Mark Morris says expenses grew last year, as the firm worked to fit its infrastructure around lateral hires from prior years. Drinker Biddle & Reath chairman Andrew Kassner says he's looking to grow the firm's ancillary businesses and consulting services.
A couple firms experienced significant head count growth as well, resulting in gross revenue gains, in a year when law firm merger activity hit an all-time high.
Saul Ewing grew gross revenue by 43 percent after merging with midsize law firm Arnstein & Lehr, bringing the firm's total head count to about 400.
Cozen O'Connor grew gross revenue by 10.7 percent as it aggressively recruited lateral partners, increasing head count by a net 48 lawyers throughout the year.
Ballard Spahr also benefited from a merger, showing growth in its media law practice after acquiring media boutique Levine Sullivan Koch & Schulz. But the firm is expected to grow by a greater margin this year, after its merger with Midwest-based Lindquist & Vennum became official Jan. 1, adding 107 lawyers to Ballard Spahr.
The two deals came after a merger drought of sorts for Ballard Spahr, whose last significant combination was its 2013 acquisition of Stillman & Friedman, a white-collar and securities litigation boutique.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllAre Counsel Ranks Getting 'Squeezed' as Nonequity and Associate Pay Grows?
5 minute readAI's Place in Big Law Broadens, As Firms Embrace Fresh Uses of the Technology
Trending Stories
- 1'A Death Sentence for TikTok'?: Litigators and Experts Weigh Impact of Potential Ban on Creators and Data Privacy
- 2Bribery Case Against Former Lt. Gov. Brian Benjamin Is Dropped
- 3‘Extremely Disturbing’: AI Firms Face Class Action by ‘Taskers’ Exposed to Traumatic Content
- 4State Appeals Court Revives BraunHagey Lawsuit Alleging $4.2M Unlawful Wire to China
- 5Invoking Trump, AG Bonta Reminds Lawyers of Duties to Noncitizens in Plea Dealing
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250