Thompson & Knight Saw Net Income Improve, Gross Revenue Slip in 2017
Dallas-based Thompson & Knight cut expenses by $5 million in 2017, which contributed to the firm's 3.5 percent growth in net income for the year.
February 08, 2018 at 06:57 PM
3 minute read
Despite a sluggish start on the transactional side, net income in 2017 grew by 3.5 percent at Dallas-based Thompson & Knight when compared with 2016, although gross revenue slipped by 0.7 percent for the year.
“We were pretty pleased with the year overall,” said managing partner Mark Sloan. “The year started off a little slower on the transactional side, but we really picked up in the second half, corporate and real estate picked up on a good note, and trial stayed busy.”
The firm brought in $212,022,000 in revenue in 2017, up from $213,445,000 the year before. With a full-time equivalent of 280 lawyers, revenue per lawyer came in at $758,000, down 2.8 percent from $780,000 in 2016.
Net income improved to $92,748,000 in 2017, up 3.5 percent from $89,634,000 in 2016. With 97 equity partners on a full-time-equivalent basis, profits per partner hit $956,000, down 2.9 percent when compared with $985,000 last year.
In 2016, Thompson & Knight's gross revenue improved by 2.9 percent and net income was up by 3.5 percent, compared with 2015. This year, ALM is rounding gross revenue and net income to the nearest $1,000—a change from prior years, when those numbers were rounded to the nearest $500,000.
Sloan said the firm's 2017 financials were affected by the end of the Life Partners Holdings Chapter 11 restructuring, which “drove a good part of '15 and '16″ and provided a lot of work to the firm's bankruptcy, corporate, finance and tax lawyers. He said bankruptcy work was down in 2017, largely because many of the problems in the oil patch have been worked out, so fewer energy companies are filing for bankruptcy, and because the firm needed to reload its bankruptcy pipeline following the end of the big Life Partners matter.
Another contributor to flat growth in revenue was the firm's investment in contingency work that hasn't paid yet, including one judgment that is on appeal, Sloan said.
On the plus side, Sloan said intellectual property litigation picked up in 2017, and other areas that were busy last year include tax controversy and government/regulatory.
The firm did a good job on the expense side in 2017, Sloan said, which contributed to the increase in net income. He said expenses were about $5 million less in 2017 than in 2016—a development he said was due in part to lower health insurance claims, but also to everyone just watching spending.
Thompson & Knight isn't the only Texas firm that carefully watched expenses in 2017. According to a new report from Citi Private Bank Law Firm Group, expenses declined by 0.1 percent in the Texas region in 2017. It was the only region in the country to post a decline in expenses.
The firm's 280 FTE head count is up 2.6 percent compared with 273 in 2016, and the firm added a net of six equity partners to reach an FTE of 97.
Sloan said the firm is well-positioned for the future.
“We've got a good track record of stability. I think we've had some good increases in profits, RPL, the last several years,” he said. “It didn't go up last year, but I feel good where we are in the market. We will have opportunities.”
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllSunbelt Law Firms Experienced More Moderate Growth Last Year, Alongside Some Job Cuts and Less Merger Interest
4 minute readOnce the LA Fires Are Extinguished, Expect the Litigation to Unfold for Years
5 minute readTrending Stories
- 1SurePoint Acquires Legal Practice Management Company ZenCase
- 2Day Pitney Announces Partner Elevations
- 3The New Rules of AI: Part 2—Designing and Implementing Governance Programs
- 4Plaintiffs Attorneys Awarded $113K on $1 Judgment in Noise Ordinance Dispute
- 5As Litigation Finance Industry Matures, Links With Insurance Tighten
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250