Alyssa Wall
June 28, 2018 | New Jersey Law Journal
Application of the Rule 26 'Proportionality Requirement' in Patent CasesDespite a seeming lack of case law on the issue, patent practitioners should not hesitate to rely upon the Rule 26 proportionality requirement to attempt to “rein in” discovery costs.
By James J. DeCarlo, Jamie L. Ryerson and Alyssa Wall
2 minute read
Trending Stories
- 1Weil Advances 18 to Partner, Largest Class Since 2021
- 2People and Purpose: AbbVie's GC on Leading With Impact and Inspiring Change
- 3Beef Between Two South Florida Law Firms Deepens With Suit Over Defamation
- 4Judge Skips Over Sanctions in Talc Bankruptcy: 'That’s A No'
- 5Hit by Mail Truck: Man Agrees to $1.85M Settlement for Spinal Injuries
More from ALM
- Legal Speak at General Counsel Conference East 2024: Match Group's Katie Dugan & Herrick's Carol Goodman 1 minute read
- Legal Speak at General Counsel Conference East 2024: Eric Wall, Executive VP, Syllo 1 minute read
- Legal Speak at General Counsel Conference East 2024: Virginia Griffith, Director of Business Development at OutsideGC 1 minute read