Arunabha Bhoumik

September 28, 2015 | New York Law Journal

Jacqueline C. Wolff and Arunabha Bhoumik of Manatt, Phelps & Phillips write: A recent case of first impression took expansive view of what constitutes "identification" of an overpayment and significantly expanded the scope of potential FCA liability for health care providers.

By Jacqueline C. Wolff and Arunabha Bhoumik

12 minute read

September 25, 2015 | New York Law Journal

Jacqueline C. Wolff and Arunabha Bhoumik of Manatt, Phelps & Phillips write: A recent case of first impression took expansive view of what constitutes "identification" of an overpayment and significantly expanded the scope of potential FCA liability for health care providers.

By Jacqueline C. Wolff and Arunabha Bhoumik

12 minute read

August 05, 2015 | Corporate Counsel

The courts have split as to whether statements to prosecutors during the course of cooperating with a government investigation can give rise to such a lawsuit.

By Jacqueline C. Wolff and Arunabha Bhoumik

10 minute read

August 05, 2015 | Corporate Counsel

The courts have split as to whether statements to prosecutors during the course of cooperating with a government investigation can give rise to such a lawsuit.

By Jacqueline C. Wolff and Arunabha Bhoumik

10 minute read

July 13, 2015 | New York Law Journal

Ronald G. Blum and Arunabha Bhoumik write: More and more, defendants find themselves in multi-front fights: Federal prosecutors bring criminal charges, while another agency brings a related civil proceeding. The factual issues in these cases are largely identical. Legal issues overlap. But curiously, because one case is labeled "civil" and the other "criminal," they are not deemed "related" under Southern District rules.

By Ronald G. Blum and Arunabha Bhoumik

9 minute read

July 10, 2015 | New York Law Journal

Ronald G. Blum and Arunabha Bhoumik write: More and more, defendants find themselves in multi-front fights: Federal prosecutors bring criminal charges, while another agency brings a related civil proceeding. The factual issues in these cases are largely identical. Legal issues overlap. But curiously, because one case is labeled "civil" and the other "criminal," they are not deemed "related" under Southern District rules.

By Ronald G. Blum and Arunabha Bhoumik

9 minute read

June 23, 2014 | New York Law Journal

Ronald G. Blum and Arunabha Bhoumik write: Behind the headlines generated by the Mathew Martoma verdict is a decision by U.S. District Judge Paul Gardephe that exposes the artifice of coordinated, but "separate," criminal and civil investigations by the DOJ and civil enforcement agencies such as the SEC, the CFTC, and Justice Department civil attorneys.

By Ronald G. Blum and Arunabha Bhoumik

12 minute read

June 27, 2008 | Law.com

After officers or directors of a publicly traded company are accused of wrongdoing and are terminated or resign, they may find themselves defending against government investigations or civil litigation. When this happens, the interests of ex-officers likely will be adverse to their former employer. The company might cooperate with a government investigation of former officers or even sue the officers itself.

By Steven F. Reich and Arunabha Bhoumik

8 minute read