Christopher K Kiplok
June 13, 2017 | New York Law Journal
A Preference Pendulum: Extraterritorial Application of Avoidance Powers in the SDNYChristopher K. Kiplok and Dustin P. Smith of Hughes Hubbard & Reed write: A recent decision by the bankruptcy court for the Southern District of New York in 'Spizz v. Goldfarb Seligman &. Co. (In re Ampal-American)', has moved the pendulum away from extraterritoriality back toward a nearer reach of avoidance powers.
By Christopher K. Kiplok and Dustin P. Smith
16 minute read
Trending Stories
- 1After Latham Mandates 4 Days in NY Office in 2025, Other Firms Sticking to 3 Days, For Now
- 2Christopher J. Morvillo: The Clifford Chance Partner Missing in Mike Lynch Yacht Disaster
- 3'Firms Fear the PR Hit, Not the Sanction': Big Law on Edge After Simpson Thacher AML Prosecution
- 4Am Law 200 Firm's Merger Yields 25% Attorney Growth and $60M More in Revenue
- 5'Big Law Killed My Husband': An Open Letter From a Sidley Partner's Widow
More from ALM
- Morgan & Morgan Class Action Attorneys Detail Pathway to Success Within Cybersecurity and Data Privacy Practice 1 minute read
- Holwell Shuster & Goldberg Partners Leverage 'Hostile' Witnesses to Secure $101 Million Verdict Against Walmart 1 minute read
- Legal Speak at General Counsel Conference Midwest 2024: Mike Andolina, Partner, White & Case 1 minute read