Christopher W Woodward
August 20, 2024 | The Legal Intelligencer
'Regular Use Exclusions' Stand: Pa. Supreme Court's Latest Ruling Post-'Gallagher'After the Pennsylvania Superior Court determined in 2021 that "regular use exclusions" in UM/UIM policies violate the Pennsylvania Motor Vehicle Financial Responsibility Law (MVFRL), and in a post-Gallagher legal landscape, some were ready to put the regular use exclusion to rest for good. Now, however, in Rush v. Erie Insurance Exchange, 308 A.3d 780 (Pa. Jan. 29, 2024), the Pennsylvania Supreme Court, in a lengthy majority opinion, has confirmed that the regular use exclusion remains very much alive.
By Allison L. Krupp and Christopher W. Woodward
7 minute read
Trending Stories
- 1Judicial Ethics Opinion 24-61
- 2Decision of the Day: School District's Probe Was a 'Sham'; Title IX Administrator Showed Sex-Based Bias
- 3US Magistrate Judge Embry Kidd Confirmed to 11th Circuit
- 4Shaq Signs $11 Million Settlement to Resolve Astrals Investor Claims
- 5McCormick Consolidates Two Tesla Chancery Cases
More from ALM
- Legal Speak: GCC East Comes to New York 1 minute read
- Legal Speak: A Convicted Felon is Coming to the White House. What Happens Now? 1 minute read
- Leveraging Partner Training To Recruit and Retain 1 minute read