Daniel B Goldman

July 18, 2023 | New York Law Journal

On May 25, 2023, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit in Syntel Sterling Best Shores Mauritius Ltd. v. TriZetto Grp., Inc. issued a ruling…

By Daniel B. Goldman and Claudia Pak

7 minute read

October 10, 2019 | New York Law Journal

The past year and a half witnessed important antitrust law developments for cases involving "two-sided" transaction markets, i.e., markets in which a sale on one side cannot be made without also making a sale on the other side of the market. Recently, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit issued a decision in 'US Airways v. Sabre Holdings', which is the next chapter in this evolving story.

By Daniel B. Goldman and Steven S. Sparling

16 minute read

September 26, 2018 | New York Law Journal

Plaintiffs in trade secret cases that seek to measure damages by defendant's avoided costs, defendant's gains, or anything other than plaintiff's losses will now be incentivized to bypass the New York state court system for federal court

By Daniel B. Goldman and Sam M. Koch

8 minute read

November 26, 2014 | New York Law Journal

write: Pursuant to the Court of Appeals' recent ruling in 'Motorola', New York law is now settled, and the separate entity rule is here to stay. The decision, however, may result in a significant limitation of 'Koehler v. Bank of Bermuda,' despite the court's attempt to distinguish its holding in 'Motorola', particularly with respect to funds held in foreign bank accounts.

By Daniel B. Goldman and Adam W. Braveman

9 minute read

March 10, 2014 | New York Law Journal

Daniel B. Goldman and Adam W. Braveman of Paul Hastings write that for over 50 years in proceedings to enforce judgments in New York, New York branches of banks have been considered separate entities from all foreign branches. This rule has prevented judgment creditors from forcing banks to restrain and/or turn over assets of a judgment debtor held by foreign branches of banks. That may now change.

By Daniel B. Goldman and Adam W. Braveman

10 minute read

February 03, 2014 | New York Law Journal

Daniel B. Goldman and Adam W. Braveman of Paul Hastings write: On Jan. 14, 2014, the U.S. Supreme Court decided 'Daimler AG v. Bauman,' an extraordinarily important opinion with respect to general personal jurisdiction over corporations, and one that effectively invalidates 47 years of general jurisdiction law in the state of New York.

By Daniel B. Goldman and Adam W. Braveman

13 minute read