Daniel Justus Solinsky

July 25, 2018 | New York Law Journal

Put bluntly: If a practitioner's summary judgment motion was denied for the plaintiff's failure to show freedom from comparative fault (pre-Rodriguez), the time to reargue is now.

By Robert L. Fellows and Daniel Justus Solinsky

1 minute read

April 24, 2017 | New York Law Journal

Joseph S. Bavaro and Daniel Justus Solinsky write that despite the Court of Appeals seemingly driving a stake through the heart of the spoliation cause of action in 'Ortega v. City of New York,' like any good movie monster, somehow it appears to have mutated and survived, as a common law claim of tortious interference by an employer with an employee's cause of action against a third party.

By Joseph S. Bavaro and Daniel Justus Solinsky

14 minute read

April 20, 2016 | New York Law Journal

Joseph S. Bavaro and Daniel Justus Solinsky write: With television shows glorifying the dangerous life of the repossession agent, it is no wonder that one often hears stories of violence carried out by these agents. The instincts of a well-trained personal injury attorney might dictate that unless the "Repo Man" has considerable assets, a lawsuit against the towing company or the lender that sent these agents would be futile—but these instincts would be wrong.

By Joseph S. Bavaro and Daniel Justus Solinsky

17 minute read