David Zaslowsky

July 30, 2008 | New York Law Journal

Lawrence W. Newman and David Zaslowsky, partners at Baker & McKenzie, discuss a recent report from the International Commercial Disputes Committee of the City Bar Association that analyzed whether §1782 may be used in connection with an international arbitration proceeding.

By Lawrence W. Newman and David Zaslowsky

11 minute read

July 28, 2011 | New York Law Journal

In their International Litigation feature, Baker & McKenzie members Lawrence W. Newman and David Zaslowsky discuss four decisions that demonstrate the fine jurisdictional lines when it comes to attachments and judgment enforcement and how the New York courts can aid efforts of asset seizure.

By Lawrence W. Newman and David Zaslowsky

10 minute read

November 24, 2010 | New York Law Journal

In their International Litigation column, Lawrence W. Newman and David Zaslowsky of Baker & McKenzie discuss how the SPEECH Act provides protection for authors and publishers against libel tourism.

By Lawrence W. Newman and David Zaslowsky

9 minute read

June 09, 2003 | New York Law Journal

By Lawrence W. Newman And David Zaslowsky

11 minute read

July 25, 2005 | New York Law Journal

Lawrence W. Newman and David Zaslowsky, partners in the New York office of Baker & McKenzie, write that key evidence or testimony often resides with persons who are not party to a dispute. If that dispute is being litigated, familiar procedures are available to obtain such evidence and testimony � both at trial and pre-trial. When, however, parties have agreed to submit their dispute to arbitration, obtaining evidence from third parties is much less straightforward.

By Lawrence W. Newman and David Zaslowsky

10 minute read