Dustin P Smith
June 13, 2017 | New York Law Journal
A Preference Pendulum: Extraterritorial Application of Avoidance Powers in the SDNYChristopher K. Kiplok and Dustin P. Smith of Hughes Hubbard & Reed write: A recent decision by the bankruptcy court for the Southern District of New York in 'Spizz v. Goldfarb Seligman &. Co. (In re Ampal-American)', has moved the pendulum away from extraterritoriality back toward a nearer reach of avoidance powers.
By Christopher K. Kiplok and Dustin P. Smith
16 minute read
Trending Stories
- 1Infant Formula Judge Sanctions Kirkland's Jim Hurst: 'Overtly Crossed the Lines'
- 2Abbott, Mead Johnson Win Defense Verdict Over Preemie Infant Formula
- 3Preparing Your Law Firm for 2025: Smart Ways to Embrace AI & Other Technologies
- 4Greenberg Traurig Initiates String of Suits Following JPMorgan Chase's 'Infinite Money Glitch'
- 5Data-Driven Legal Strategies
More from ALM
- Morgan & Morgan Class Action Attorneys Detail Pathway to Success Within Cybersecurity and Data Privacy Practice 1 minute read
- Holwell Shuster & Goldberg Partners Leverage 'Hostile' Witnesses to Secure $101 Million Verdict Against Walmart 1 minute read
- Legal Speak at General Counsel Conference Midwest 2024: Mike Andolina, Partner, White & Case 1 minute read