March 27, 2008 | New York Law Journal
AntitrustElai Katz, a partner at Cahill Gordon & Reindel, writes that the House of Lords decided that a British citizen indicted for criminal antitrust violations in the U.S. should not be extradited because price fixing was not a crime in the U.K. at the time of the alleged violation. Also, the Ninth Circuit affirmed a district court's dismissal of price-fixing claims against banks and a credit-card network, following the U.S. Supreme Court's recent teachings on pleading standards.
By Elai Katz
11 minute read
November 14, 2006 | New York Law Journal
AntitrustWilliam T. Lifland, senior counsel of Cahill Gordon & Reindel, and Elai Katz, a partner at the firm, write that one federal appellate court recently ruled that a losing bidder for steel producing assets had standing to bring antitrust claims against the successful purchaser, while another held that the former owner of a car dealership lacked standing to bring claims of an unlawful conspiracy to harm the dealership.
By William T. Lifland and Elai Katz
8 minute read
Trending Stories