Elkan Abramowitz

July 01, 2002 | New York Law Journal

S hortly before announcing its verdict in the Arthur Andersen obstruction of justice trial last month, the jurors presented District Judge Melinda Harmon with the perplexing question of whether they had to be unanimous as to which Andersen employee acted with corrupt intent in obstructing the SEC investigation into the collapse of the Enron Corp. Because, as indicated on the special verdict form, the jury ultimately reached a unanimous decision on the identity of the corrupt actor, Judge Harmon`s decision t

By Elkan Abramowitz And Barry A. Bohrer

13 minute read