Evan H Krinick

March 07, 2002 | New York Law Journal

Medical malpractice cases brought in Long Island courts often reach the Appellate Division, Second Department. 1 Recent decisions issued by the Second Department on appeal in these matters have focused on a wide range of issues.

By Evan H. Krinick and David E. Richman

8 minute read

September 11, 2007 | New York Law Journal

Evan H. Krinick, a partner with Rivkin Radler, reviews recent Second Department cases with municipal defendants involving issues such as immunity and the "special relationship" exemption, prior written notice in personal injury complaints, tax certiorari and the Freedom of Information Law.

By Evan H. Krinick

9 minute read

May 10, 2002 | New York Law Journal

In recent weeks, the Appellate Division, Second Department, has issued decisions in a wide range of Long Island cases in which it reviewed the standards for a host of important trial level motions. Although certainly of interest to appellate lawyers, these rulings also may be of note to litigators seeking to restore a case to trial, renew or reargue a prior motion or even file an amended complaint.

By Evan H. Krinick

9 minute read

July 11, 2006 | New York Law Journal

Evan H. Krinick, a partner with Rivkin Radler LLP, writes that a wide variety of breach of contract cases arising in Long Island courts reached the Appellate Division, Second Department, in recent weeks, allowing the appellate court the opportunity to clearly set forth some important contract law principles and to help resolve a number of significant disputes.

By Evan H. Krinick

8 minute read

June 10, 2008 | New York Law Journal

Evan H. Krinick and Jeffrey S. Greener, partners at Rivkin Radler, write that disputes between or among family members can be the most difficult to resolve and the most hard-fought. It should come as no surprise, therefore, that these types of cases frequently reach the appellate level.

By Evan H. Krinick and Jeffrey S. Greener

13 minute read

May 01, 2009 | New York Law Journal

Evan H. Krinick, a partner with Rivkin Radler, writes: The payment or rejection of claims is a part of the regular business of insurance companies. Toward that end, carriers rely on a wide variety of processes and individuals to determine whether claims should be paid or denied, or whether particular claims are fraudulent. In many instances, an insurer will exercise its right under an insurance policy to have its attorneys conduct an examination under oath (EUO) of an insured. An issue that commonly arises is whether a report, letter, or other documents prepared by counsel following an EUO are discoverable by the insured in the event the claim is denied and litigation ensues.

By Evan H. Krinick

9 minute read

September 14, 2004 | New York Law Journal

Evan H. Krinick and Cheryl F. Korman, partners with Rivkin Radler, write that an informal survey of rulings on the "serious injury" provisions of the No-Fault Law suggests a number of important considerations for both plaintiffs and defendants, and their attorneys.

By Evan H. Krinick and Cheryl F. Korman

10 minute read

January 10, 2006 | New York Law Journal

Evan H. Krinick and Kenneth A. Novikoff, partners at Rivkin Radler, write that retaliation is one of the more common employment discrimination claims asserted in litigation by employees against their former employers. A variety of Long Island-based retaliation claims have been analyzed by federal and state courts.

By Evan H. Krinick and Kenneth A. Novikoff

8 minute read

June 14, 2005 | New York Law Journal

Evan H. Krinick, a partner with Rivkin Radler, writes that corporations and corporate law issues have been featured recently in a number of significant decisions by the Appellate Division, Second Department, in cases arising on Long Island.

By Evan H. Krinick

7 minute read