July 01, 2016 | New York Law Journal
Rowland Conviction Rests on Expansive Interpretation of Sarbanes-OxleyHarry Sandick of Patterson Belknap Webb & Tyler discusses the recent Second Circuit decision in 'Rowland', a case involving falsifying records, and writes: Given the Supreme Court's longstanding interest in limiting the breadth of the statutes that prohibit obstruction of justice, 'Rowland' may warrant further appellate review.
By Harry Sandick
22 minute read
January 29, 2015 | New York Law Journal
Proposed Amendments to Fraud Sentencing GuidelinesHarry Sandick and Julia Stepanova write that on Jan. 9, the Sentencing Commission took a small but productive step in the right direction when it promulgated a series of proposed amendments to the section of the Guidelines that governs sentencing in fraud cases. While the individual impact of these revisions is small, together they amount to a welcome first step.
By Harry Sandick and Julia Stepanova
10 minute read
January 28, 2015 | New York Law Journal
Proposed Amendments to Fraud Sentencing GuidelinesHarry Sandick and Julia Stepanova write that on Jan. 9, the Sentencing Commission took a small but productive step in the right direction when it promulgated a series of proposed amendments to the section of the Guidelines that governs sentencing in fraud cases. While the individual impact of these revisions is small, together they amount to a welcome first step.
By Harry Sandick and Julia Stepanova
10 minute read
August 22, 2012 | Inside Counsel
Regulatory: Relief for victims and third parties through asset forfeitureForfeited property generally goes to the government to spend in whatever manner it sees fit. However there are means by which victims or third parties can challenge a forfeiture.
By Dan Ruzumna, Harry Sandick
7 minute read
August 08, 2012 | Inside Counsel
Regulatory: Financial relief through asset forfeitureAs the recent economic crisis has shown, individuals are not the only victims of financial crimes.
By Dan Ruzumna, Harry Sandick
7 minute read
July 11, 2012 | Inside Counsel
Regulatory: You’d better watch what you sayThe role of the Fifth Amendment in cross-border investigations
By Harry Sandick, Joshua Goldberg
5 minute read
June 27, 2012 | Inside Counsel
Regulatory: The consequences of OFAC investigations and subpoenasOFAC views itself as playing an integral part in protecting U.S. national security, and it therefore takes its sanctions programs very seriously.
By Harry Sandick, Dan Ruzumna
10 minute read
June 13, 2012 | Inside Counsel
Regulatory: As a matter OFACYou are sitting at your desk when you are handed an envelope that just arrived in the mail.
By Harry Sandick, Dan Ruzumna
8 minute read
September 18, 2008 | New York Law Journal
'Amato': Second Circuit Recognizes Costs of Being VictimHarry Sandick, a special counsel at Schulte Roth & Zabel, writes that the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit recently expanded the ability of courts to use restitution to compensate victims in white-collar criminal cases. As a result, defendants convicted in the Second Circuit can be ordered to reimburse victims for legal and accounting fees incurred by victims in connection with investigation and prosecution.
By Harry Sandick
14 minute read
August 09, 2007 | New York Law Journal
Recent Decision Expands Use of Rule 17 SubpoenaHarry Sandick, a partner at Jenner & Block, and Brian J. Fischer, an associate at the firm, write that although a recent decision in United States v. Stein speaks only to the special situation that exists when a company has entered into an agreement with the government that commits the company to produce documents on the government's request, Judge Kaplan's opinion raises the broader question about whether United States v. Nixon has been too reflexively applied.
By Harry Sandick and Brian J. Fischer
14 minute read
Trending Stories