July 26, 2017 | Delaware Business Court Insider
Slights Finds a Limit on Corporate Power to Validate Acts Under DGCL Section 204In a case of first impression, Vice Chancellor Joseph R. Slights III of the Delaware Court of Chancery ruled that Section 204 of the Delaware General Corporation Law cannot be used to validate an "unauthorized" corporate act.
By James G. McMillan III
8 minute read
December 07, 2016 | Delaware Business Court Insider
Bouchard Rejects Merger Consideration as an Indicator of ValueIn several recent statutory appraisal actions, the Delaware Court of Chancery has concluded that the fair value of the corporation was equal to the agreed-upon deal price. However, in one recent appraisal action, Chancellor Andre G. Bouchard rejected the defendant corporation's argument that the merger consideration could be "relied upon by the court to set the appraisal value."
By James G. McMillan III
15 minute read
October 05, 2016 | Delaware Business Court Insider
How Can Plaintiffs Support Disclosure Claims in Merger Cases Post-'Corwin'?In the now-familiar case, Corwin v. KKR Financial Holdings, 125 A.3d 304, 305-06 (Del. 2015), the Delaware Supreme Court affirmed the Court of Chancery's holding "that the business judgment rule is invoked as the appropriate standard of review for a post-closing damages action when a merger that is not subject to the entire fairness standard of review has been approved by a fully informed, uncoerced majority of the disinterested stockholders."
By James G. McMillan III
13 minute read
October 07, 2015 | Delaware Business Court Insider
Laster Dismisses Stockholder Merger Action From the BenchIn an unusual move, Vice Chancellor J. Travis Laster recently ruled from the bench at oral argument, dismissing a stockholder complaint challenging the acquisition of a company with a controlling stockholder. In In re Schawk Stockholders Litigation, C.A. No. 9510-VCL (Del. Ch. Sept. 15, 2015) (Transcript), the Delaware Court of Chancery found the controlling stockholder's interest in a sale of the company to a third party was aligned with the interests of the minority stockholders, and the decision to sell was protected by the business judgment rule. Although the vice chancellor expressed the view that the standard in any case involving a controlling stockholder should be enhanced scrutiny, he concluded the result in this case would be the same.
By James G. McMillan III
6 minute read
October 07, 2015 | Delaware Business Court Insider
Laster Dismisses Stockholder Merger Action From the BenchIn an unusual move, Vice Chancellor J. Travis Laster recently ruled from the bench at oral argument, dismissing a stockholder complaint challenging the acquisition of a company with a controlling stockholder. In In re Schawk Stockholders Litigation, C.A. No. 9510-VCL (Del. Ch. Sept. 15, 2015) (Transcript), the Delaware Court of Chancery found the controlling stockholder's interest in a sale of the company to a third party was aligned with the interests of the minority stockholders, and the decision to sell was protected by the business judgment rule. Although the vice chancellor expressed the view that the standard in any case involving a controlling stockholder should be enhanced scrutiny, he concluded the result in this case would be the same.
By James G. McMillan III
6 minute read
July 01, 2015 | Delaware Business Court Insider
How an Equipment Upgrade Led to Spoliation ChargesDiscovery missteps often lead to costly and time-consuming motion practice, and may result in charges of spoliation, whether unintentional or otherwise. Unfortunately, spoliation of evidence in e-discovery has become a recurring theme in the Court of Chancery.
By James G. McMillan III and Joseph A. Tate Jr.
9 minute read
July 01, 2015 | Delaware Business Court Insider
How an Equipment Upgrade Led to Spoliation ChargesDiscovery missteps often lead to costly and time-consuming motion practice, and may result in charges of spoliation, whether unintentional or otherwise. Unfortunately, spoliation of evidence in e-discovery has become a recurring theme in the Court of Chancery.
By James G. McMillan III and Joseph A. Tate Jr.
9 minute read
April 01, 2015 | Delaware Business Court Insider
Are Drag-Along Rights Enforceable Against Common Stockholders in Mergers?A recent opinion from the Delaware Court of Chancery raised, but left unanswered, the question of whether common stockholders may contractually waive their statutory rights to an appraisal of shares by the court following a short-form merger.
By James G. McMillan III
6 minute read
April 01, 2015 | Delaware Business Court Insider
Are Drag-Along Rights Enforceable Against Common Stockholders in Mergers?A recent opinion from the Delaware Court of Chancery raised, but left unanswered, the question of whether common stockholders may contractually waive their statutory rights to an appraisal of shares by the court following a short-form merger.
By James G. McMillan III
6 minute read