Jay C Carlisle Ii

December 10, 2015 | New York Law Journal

Mark C. Fang and Jay C. Carlisle II write that the treatment of the preclusive effect of administrative determinations taken by the Southern District in 'U.S. v. East River Housing' deserves close attention in light of the Supreme Court's broad interpretation of the scope and nature of the Fair Housing Act earlier this year, possibly pointing the way to a new result on an unsettled issue of significant bearing on the procedural course of FHA discrimination claims in New York.

By Mark C. Fang and Jay C. Carlisle II

15 minute read

December 09, 2015 | New York Law Journal

Mark C. Fang and Jay C. Carlisle II write that the treatment of the preclusive effect of administrative determinations taken by the Southern District in 'U.S. v. East River Housing' deserves close attention in light of the Supreme Court's broad interpretation of the scope and nature of the Fair Housing Act earlier this year, possibly pointing the way to a new result on an unsettled issue of significant bearing on the procedural course of FHA discrimination claims in New York.

By Mark C. Fang and Jay C. Carlisle II

15 minute read

October 22, 2013 | New York Law Journal

By Jay C. Carlisle II, Randolph M. McLaughlin, Bennett L. Gershman, Merril Sobie

3 minute read