March 04, 2022 | New York Law Journal
The Snake Attack Phenomenon: The Courts Must Stop Overlooking and Facilitating the Continued Poisoning of Our Jury SystemThis boundary-pushing has an erosive and corrosive effect.
By Timothy R. Capowski, John F. Watkins and Sofya Uvaydov
27 minute read
July 27, 2020 | New York Law Journal
Ahead to the Past (Part III of III): The Evolution of New Rules of Engagement in the Age of Social Inflation and Nuclear VerdictsThe first two parts of this series discussed the role of certain tactics and improper summation techniques and what the defense bar and the judiciary can and should do to curb these abuses and restore sane, predictable, compensatory justice to the tort system. This third and last part turns outside the courtroom itself to the broader culture that enables these abuses.
By Timothy R. Capowski, John F. Watkins, and Jonathan P. Shaub
13 minute read
July 13, 2020 | New York Law Journal
Ahead to the Past: The Evolution of New Rules of Engagement in the Age of Social Inflation and Nuclear VerdictsPart one in a three-part series discussing the different angles of the nuclear verdict/social inflation dilemma in New York.
By Timothy R. Capowski, John F. Watkins, and Jonathan P. Shaub.
17 minute read
September 04, 2019 | New York Law Journal
Time To Repair the Split in Application of Labor Law §200In three of the Appellate Division Departments, a plaintiff wishing to impose Labor Law §200 liability on an owner or general contractor in a "means and methods" case must establish that the owner or GC "actually exercised" control over the means and methods of the work. However, in the Second Department, since 'Ortega v. Puccia,' an owner or GC may be held liable if it had "authority" to control the means and methods of the work. In this article, the authors suggest it is well past time to remedy this split between the Departments.
By Timothy R. Capowski and John F. Watkins
9 minute read
July 12, 2019 | New York Law Journal
CPLR 5501(c) Review of Excessive Future Medical Expenses AwardsWe recommend that defense attorneys advocate more aggressively for CPLR 5501(c) comparative case analysis review of future medical awards.
By Timothy R. Capowski and John F. Watkins
9 minute read
June 26, 2019 | New York Law Journal
CPLR 5501(c) Review in the Age of Summation 'Anchoring' AbuseAbuse of the right to suggest a proposed figure pursuant to CPLR 4016(b) cannot be permitted without violating the explicit point and purpose of CPLR 5501(c) and should no longer be tolerated.
By Timothy R. Capowski and John F. Watkins
9 minute read
Trending Stories