Jonathan S Sack

January 17, 2007 | New York Law Journal

Jonathan S. Sack, a principal at Morvillo, Abramowitz, Grand, Iason, Anello & Bohrer, P.C., writes that Justice Antonin Scalia's opinion in Gonzalez-Lopez makes clear that district courts retain a great deal of latitude in deciding conflicts matters, so findings of erroneous deprivation of the right to counsel of choice, and reversals of criminal convictions under the standard articulated in Gonzalez-Lopez, may be few and far between.

By Jonathan S. Sack

17 minute read

September 15, 2010 | New York Law Journal

Jonathan S. Sack and Kefira R. Wilderman of Morvillo, Abramowitz, Grand, Iason, Anello & Bohrer discuss how the Dodd-Frank Act greatly increases rating agencies' potential liability under the securities laws and how rating agencies are unlikely to fare as well in the courts as they previously have.

By Jonathan S. Sack and Kefira R. Wilderman

12 minute read

April 05, 2006 | New York Law Journal

Jonathan S. Sack, a principal at Morvillo, Abramowitz, Grand, Iason & Silberberg PC, and Thomas M. Keane, an associate at the firm, write that Eliot Spitzer has received considerable attention in recent years for his aggressive enforcement efforts aimed at a range of business activities. The attorney general's traditional role in the realm of consumer protection is less publicized but no less important, as recently demonstrated when the attorney general filed suit against H&R Block Inc.

By Jonathan S. Sack and Thomas M. Keane

16 minute read