July 08, 2021 | New York Law Journal
U.S. Supreme Court Again Restricts the Viability of International Human Rights Lawsuits in Federal Courts Under the 1789 Alien Tort StatuteA near-unanimous majority of the U.S. Supreme Court dealt yet another blow to plaintiffs seeking to bring lawsuits against corporations for violations of international law holding that mere "corporate activity" within the United States is not enough to satisfy the general presumption against the extraterritorial application of federal law.
By Samuel Estreicher and Julian G. Ku
7 minute read
June 10, 2021 | New York Law Journal
Hamas, Not Israel, Violated International Humanitarian LawApplication of the relevant legal standards reveals that Israel has a sound legal justification for using military force against Hamas, and that its use of such force likely conformed to the applicable international laws of war, whereas Hamas on the other hand has repeatedly violated the core, bedrock principle that civilians cannot be targeted, whatever the ostensible justification.
By Samuel Estreicher and Julian G. Ku
9 minute read
April 20, 2021 | New York Law Journal
International Criminal Court Authorizes Investigation Into Alleged War Crimes in Territory 'Occupied' by Israel as a Result of the Israeli-Palestinian ConflictIn this U.S. Foreign Relations column, Samuel Estreicher and Julian G. Ku discuss a recent ruling that the ICC's jurisdiction extends to territory occupied by Israel during the 1967 Six Day War, namely, the West Bank, Gaza and East Jerusalem. The decision clears the way for the ICC's Prosecutor to investigate, arrest, and try any individual whom it finds has committed serious violations of international law in those territories. Israel has rejected this decision and its applicability to Israeli nationals, especially Israeli soldiers. The largely unpersuasive legal basis for the decision to authorize expansive jurisdiction will undercut the ICC's future effectiveness and legitimacy.
By Samuel Estreicher and Julian G. Ku
8 minute read
March 17, 2021 | New York Law Journal
Supreme Court Rules That Claims of Nazi-Era Expropriation of Jewish Property Are Barred by Germany's Sovereign ImmunityThe court's strict interpretation of when international law would permit an exception to foreign sovereign immunity fits within a larger pattern of Supreme Court decisions restricting the ability of foreign plaintiffs to bring cases into U.S. courts that have little or no connection to the United States.
By Samuel Estreicher and Julian G. Ku
10 minute read
Trending Stories